CARICOM secretariat clashes with online publication

Baroness Scotland is in the center of the controversy
Baroness Scotland is at the center of the controversy

A war of words has developed between the Guyana-based CARICOM secretariat and online outlet, Caribbean News Now, following the publication of an article entitled “Dominica confuses and embarrasses CARICOM.”

Apparently the secretariat is unhappy about the article, describing it as “grossly inaccurate.”

The article alleges that Dominica caused “confusion and embarrassment” to other CARICOM governments recently at scheduled meeting of CARICOM foreign ministers in New York when Baroness Patricia Scotland of Asthal, a member of the British House of Lords, was found to be occupying Dominica’s chair. It also said that because of Scotland’s presence, the meeting was delayed and eventually she was “quietly asked to leave the room.”

Scotland is Dominica’s nominee for Commonwealth Secretary General.

In a statement the CARICOM secretariat said, “Contrary to the reporting in the second paragraph (of the article), the delay at the start of the meeting of the Council for Foreign and Community Relations (COFCOR) held in New York, USA on 25th September was simply due to the participants awaiting their colleagues to ensure that the meeting began with a quorum.”

It continued, “Further, much later in the proceedings as the Ministers moved to consider the agenda item with respect to candidatures of CARICOM and of third countries seeking CARICOM support, delegates who had been proposed as CARICOM candidates for the posts of Commonwealth Secretary General and Assistant Secretary-General of the Organisation of American States left the room as is normal procedure in such circumstances.”

“It is highly unfortunate that such an interpretation of those particular aspects of the meeting should be so inaccurate,” the secretariat said. “It would be preferable if you attempt to corroborate the facts from official sources before publication and in that regard the Communications Unit of the CARICOM secretariat is always at your service.”

But it appears Caribbean News Now is not taking the matter lying down.

Barry Randall, managing editor of the publication, is demanding that the secretariat clarify a number of issues.

“Your statement in effect asserts that a sitting member of the British parliament was permitted to participate in high level proceedings of CARICOM ministers at which sensitive matters of foreign policy and the corresponding governmental and regional positions would have been discussed – with the claimed exception of one single session,” he said in an email. “Please reconfirm that our understanding in this respect is correct.”

Randall is also asking the secretariat to “state whether and in what circumstances the same privilege would have been extended to, for example, a sitting member of the US Congress or the Canadian parliament, or any other foreign parliamentarian for that matter.”

He continued, “You also state that the candidates for the position of Commonwealth secretary general were asked to excuse themselves from the relevant discussions. Please indicate which candidates for the position of Commonwealth secretary general were in fact present at the meeting in question.”

“Finally,” Randall wrote. “Just as you admonish us to corroborate facts before publishing, we urge you to do the same before issuing statements because the unavoidable conclusion to be drawn from your response is that senior regional ministers cannot now be relied upon to report events truthfully.”

The matter has caused a firestorm of controversy in Dominica and Dominica’s ambassador to the United Nations, Vince Henderson said the article “is the furthest thing from the truth.”

Copyright 2012 Dominica News Online, DURAVISION INC. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.

Disclaimer: The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of DominicaNewsOnline.com and its parent company or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by DominicaNewsOnline.com. We never censor based on political or ideological points of view, but we do try to maintain a sensible balance between free speech and responsible moderating.

We will delete comments that:

  • contain any material which violates or infringes the rights of any person, are defamatory or harassing or are purely ad hominem attacks
  • a reasonable person would consider abusive or profane
  • contain material which violates or encourages others to violate any applicable law
  • promote prejudice or prejudicial hatred of any kind
  • refer to people arrested or charged with a crime as though they had been found guilty
  • contain links to "chain letters", pornographic or obscene movies or graphic images
  • are off-topic and/or excessively long

See our full comment/user policy/agreement.

121 Comments

  1. October 1, 2014

    Love that smile Baroness Scotland !
    Am gonna be in London by mid fall
    Looking forward to frolic in the politics

    • Anonymous
      October 2, 2014

      You are rude. Give the lady some respect.

  2. Jay
    October 1, 2014

    Someone posed the question on this forum:” would a U.K. Conservative Party government nominate a member of the Labour Party”.
    The answer to that is a resounding”yes”. Baroness Patricia Scotland visited S.Africa from 2-7 March of this year as British Prime Minister David Cameron’s Trade Envoy for S.Africa.

    You can read the relevant British Government’s announcement in full on their official web site: http://www.gov.uk/government/…/uk-trade-envoy-visits-south africa

  3. October 1, 2014

    So, Barbara Saunders Skerrit et Al soon going to fall on their swords? lol
    In addition:Attitudes and behaviours which are nurtured over time do not disappear overnight, so what we have been feeding our people over the years, particularly the young will come back to bite us. Nuh Barbs you got this one wrong. No coming back to bite us ,it is biting us daily with ever act of stupidity. Nurture this one in the nature island.

    • October 1, 2014

      Bards the country needs a political transfusion or a political bone marrow replacement. DA is in a bad shape we might just need to read her last sacrament. The donors are infected too so not a good match.
      Am out side . We hear about thinking outside the box all our make believe educated folk love this expression.Man allof you are in the box how are you to think outside. Iam not in DA so one possible donor of new uncontaminated blood. Im asking a few good D/can uncontaminated men and women to comeforward and save this land call DA.
      What do you think Barbs?

      • Barbara Saunders
        October 2, 2014

        Bardara

        When you find them, send an e-mail to DNO so we can all read who they are. Unlike you I am here and have been here for a long time. I am older than 10 years and unfortunately unable to clear the recycle bin of my memory and start with a new folder.
        No, we are not all in the box. Some of us just know that those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it.

    • Barbara Saunders
      October 2, 2014

      Okay then Badara, suit yourself!

      But I am saying it won’t stop biting, and the falling on the swords won’t stop, change or no change, unless we start sowing good and positive attitudes and behaviours on both sides of the divide.

  4. john paul
    October 1, 2014

    Remember the arguments Mr.Astaphan used to justify why we should disconnect Dominica from the Privy Council? These same arguments are coming back to haunt Tony.

  5. Hmmm
    October 1, 2014

    it never said that she was asked to leave or made to leave…if said candidates left as per protocol. Most
    Ikelt, they knew before hand that stab certain point they must excuse themselves!

    This is normal….I’ve been to many meetings where certain parts of the agendas I had to excuse myself. It could have been because it was inc a era, or I didn’t want to be part of that aspect of the meting etc.

    But such is normal, to be present for some, but not all parts of a meeting

  6. Truth Hurts
    October 1, 2014

    The Baroness spent her first 2 years in D’a and the next 50 years in Britain representing D’a at Caricom. As a sitting MP in Britain and a titled member of the British aristocracy, her personal life, professional life and political life are characterized by sworn allegiance and service to the British Crown– not Caricom. Despite her long and loyal service to the former colonial power, Britain has not nominated her for the position she now seeks. So why is it that a Baroness who has absolutely no record of public service in Caricom– who is a titled British citizen and a sworn crusader for British interests– being foisted on Caricom as a representative of D’a and possible Caricom nominee? Well. . . because Skerrit wants it so. Why does he want it so? Well. . . because he seeks political mileage for putting a “Dominican” in a high-profile international job. Will we let him get away with it? Well. . . are our eyes wide shut?

    • Femme San Joseph
      October 2, 2014

      Baroness Scotland is not a hereditary peer or an MP. She holds no position in the Government or Opposition. Her title and seat in the House of Lords is for life. Since 2010 she returned to private practice and is free to accept this post and any other she wishes. She is a proud citizen of Dominica and has brought it considerable credit. It is that we Dominicans at our best are hospitable, open minded people who treat others like brothers and sisters who God allowed to be born elsewhere. Finally as her father would have said: “Those whom God blesses no man may curse”.

  7. ROSEAU VALLEY
    October 1, 2014

    THE SAME DLP’s MODUS OPERANDI

    When Matt Peltier wrote a story “Million Dollar Assets on $5000.00 salary, he was viciously attacked and sued;

    When Thomson Fontaine raised issues in the Dominican.net about the unlawful sale of our passports, he was attacked and sued;

    When a Bangladeshi criminal made damming accusations in a series of articles about the alleged corrupt practices of the DLP administration, he was first severely attacked, then befriended and bribed and the publication of the articles miraculously stopped;

    When an International/Hemispheric Organization wrote about the death of Democracy in Dominica, a 49 page memorandum was hastily dispatched with threats to the Organization and soon thereafter, the article was withdrawn;

    Now, the same approach is being used against Caribbean News Now. But this time the editor is standing his ground to the attack and threats. Unlike Matt Peltier and the Times, Caribbean News Now will not accept a settlement as a bribe to be quiet;

    Yow tout sue!
    Respectfully
    Roseau Valley

    • .
      October 1, 2014

      Get over yourself. Serritt and the DLP are not that powerful to buy everybody. When the truth reveals all untrue stories are recanted because they were UNTRUE in the first place.

  8. ROSEAU VALLEY
    October 1, 2014

    OUR SPIN DOCTOR CAN SPIN THE BARONESS STORY AS MUCH AS HE LIKES. – THE FACTS ARE THE FACTS- HE SHOULD STICK TO THEM AND STOP THE LIES.
    TEAM DOMINICA /UWP IS NOT BASHING BARONESS SCOTLAND.

    We have all been listening to all sides on this issue of the discomfiture and shameful display of our Dominican administration and the unprofessional and embarrassing conduct of the Dominican Ambassador, who is now the Secretary-General of CARICOM.

    Before dealing with the core issue, one should pose a few questions and eliminate what this issue is not about.

    1. Why has Tony and the DLP changed the issue to one of bashing Baroness Scotland? Who is doing that? Definitely not UWP/Team Dominica. This is not even an issue. The UWP recognized that Baroness Scotland is a distinguished Dominican lady, who is highly qualified and happens to have lived most of her life in England.

    2. The editor of CaribbeanNewsNow has posed some interesting questions to both the DLP CARICOM SG and the DLP administration, which exposed the partisan nature of the Dominican Ambassador at CARICOM- which continues to embarrass the regional Organization. To date, they cannot respond but they keep braying.

    3. Please! This is an article written and published by CaribbeanNewsNow. This is not a story that originated from the UWP. Therefore, if Tony and others wish to bray like A….s, then they could try to attack CaribbeanNewsNow. The UWP is not bashing anyone. It is grossly unfair to attribute blame to Team Dominica/UWP for what the DLP say is “Bashing” Baroness Scotland. No one is against citizens of Dominica living abroad. Stop lying. No one is attacking the lady’s qualifications or her accomplishments or denigrating the lady. Stop the lies. Stick to the facts and do not spin and deflect the issue from what it is not.

    4. TONY keeps saying that Baroness was never asked to leave, albeit the DLP Ambassadors to the UN , Vince Henderson and the DLP Ambassador to CARICOM both confirmed the fact that Baroness Scotland was asked to leave the meeting whether “quietly” or embarrassingly so – she was asked to excuse herself from the meeting. Stop the lies! les! lies and cover ups.

    Lennox Linton did not “bash” Baroness Scotland. We heard him showering praises and highlighting her outstanding achievements. He even stated that she would be a great candidate. Lennox simply referenced the facts of the article published by CaribbeanNewsNow and sought to demonstrate how inept the DLP administration continues to be.
    The core issue of the story that Tony and the DLP seem to be ignoring is that fact that Dominica did in fact caused “confusion and embarrassment” to other CARICOM governments at the meeting of CARICOM foreign ministers when Baroness Scotland, a member of the British House of Lords, was found to be occupying Dominica’s chair and her presence at the meeting was unwelcomed as it was not in accordance with protocol. The issue is not about whether other CARICOM countries support or do not support Baroness Scotland as Dominica’s candidate or whether other CARICOM countries also presented a candidate. That is not in issue.

    The fact remains that there were no other candidates present at the meeting. Only the Dominica candidate was at the meeting and asked to leave.

    No other candidate for the position of Commonwealth SG was present and asked to be excused. This is the core issue on which the DLP and the CARICOM Ambassador continue to lie and contradict themselves.

    Furthermore, notwithstanding what Tony and the DLP may say, there is something to be said about someone who has never worked in Dominica or the Caribbean, who is a sitting member of the British parliament sitting as a representative of a CARICOM member state at a CARICOM meeting with CARICOM ministers where sensitive political issues pertaining to the CARICOM is being discussed. Candidates who put themselves up for elections at these meetings do not customarily attend meetings in which there candidature is being discussed.

    This conduct of the DLP and the SG of CARICOM are embarrassing and shameful.

    Respectfully
    Roseau Valley

    • Me
      October 1, 2014

      Succinct and to the point. In trying to spin this story and deflect from the real issues our Govt. is only tarnishing the international image of Dominica further. It is shameful.

  9. spawn
    October 1, 2014

    mr what about vince before you interpret you must read carefully no one was asked to leave the room the report states that” support, delegates who had been proposed as CARICOM candidates for the posts of Commonwealth Secretary General and Assistant Secretary-General of the Organisation of American States left the room as is normal procedure in such circumstances.”

  10. Papa Dom
    October 1, 2014

    This statement by the labour supporting Dominican Caricom official is misleading. This was supposed to be a meeting of Caricom firing ministers, wasn’t it? Then my question is why was she at this meeting? No announcement has been made to the populace that she officiated in that capacity so it is fair to conclude that she is not. Furthermore, if it is allowed for someone else to represent the foreign minister, then the general population should be made aware of any such decision.
    The next issue is that of potential candidates being asked to leave the meeting. It is standard practice that if a member of a committee is being considered for a post then that member is excluded from the deliberations. So for example, if skerritt was being considered for the post he would have been asked to leave the meeting at that juncture. He would never have been asked to leave before then however sensitive the nature of discussions was. So in a nutshell the good lady had no right to be at the meeting. No amount of spin can justify this disgraceful and disrespectful behaviour on the part of skerritt and the total lack of good judgement by Baroness Scotland.

  11. ATKINSON
    October 1, 2014

    Hey why is caricom having a meeting in manhattan-new york and not in the caribbean :?: And if caricom and the commonwealth close their office, no one would notice or care. Dominica can name who ever they want to represent them.

    • October 1, 2014

      hey you ought to have soken with the village schoolmaster B4 spilling ur ignorance in public/online. saqway…………………….what I will not say.
      you stand out like a rotton apple or for you banana in the bunch.
      You seem not to have a clue of the topic being discussed. Saqway…………………..sort

  12. The Facts
    September 30, 2014

    It is now denied that she was not asked to leave. She voluntarily left. It is not even making worldwide news.
    Let us put it down to, this story is much ado about nothing. It is only a storm in a teapot and not worth my further comments.

  13. What about Vince
    September 30, 2014

    An important part of the story has been left out.

    According to Caribbean News Now, “Dominica’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Vince Henderson, has also issued a similar statement, except he insists that “at no time was Baroness Scotland asked to leave any meeting”, which itself contradicts the CARICOM statement saying that she was in fact asked to leave as above.”

    Who is tellling the truth and who is not?

    • dady
      September 30, 2014

      read my brother read

    • ForChris
      September 30, 2014

      You talk about leaving things out, but If only you continued reading……”As is customary at these meetings, and of course Baroness Scotland, a Queen’s Counsel, is no stranger to that, when a matter in which someone has a personal interest is being discussed, the person must excuse himself or herself. That was done with decorum and befitting of a Dominican who has attained such high office. She left and returned after the matter was discussed,” he explained.”

    • open minded
      September 30, 2014

      What About Vince? The story stated that she was asked to leave the meeting and that she was the reason that the meeting started late. Vince has said that she was not asked to leave. The Caricom statement says the applicants left the room as is customary when matters concerning their interest was going to be discussed. Were they asked to leave or did they leave as is protocol? where is the mistruth there? clown?

    • Stamos
      October 1, 2014

      You did not listen well. He said HE asked her to leave and for the same reason. He said AT NO TIME AS SHE ASKED BY OTHER MEMBERS to leave, but he conveyed the message to her that she had to step out for that section of the agenda. Go and listen again, and this time listen to hear, not to rebut. When we listen to hear, we hear everything, when we listen to rebut, we are only hearing what we think will make an argument…. try it.

      • Just Observing
        October 1, 2014

        I also heard the Ambassador Vince Henderson give the reason for asking her to leave at a particular stage. According to Ambassador Henderson, she did not have an agenda and could not know what was up for discussion next. Whether we beleive Mr. Henderson this on particular detail is another matter. What concerns me is the hysteria that has been created. Everybody seem to be focusing on what steps or mis-steps the government might have made on this matter and have attributed that to corruption and other UWP led political language. It comes across to me that PmSkerrit and his government is weildinga tremendous amount of influence not only in Dominica but indeed to other jurisdictions to the extent that they can dictate and tell other professionals in foreign lands how to behave. PM Skerrit seems to be such a super man such that he can tell the career professionals at the Caricom Secretariat how to behave, and to even tell an untruth to protect his “evil”. See how the UWP led opposition is able to lower the discussion to suggest that Dominica’s Caricom Ambassador is behind the response from Caricom.

        As long as you do not agree with the UWP in its quest to wrest power from the DLP at any cost, no matter how, you are castigated and maligned to the furthest heaven. Baroness Scotland does not deserve such a treatment. I belive it would be music to the ear if later today they would hear the “breaking news” that Baroness Scotland has declined and withdrew her name for nomination as Secretary general of the Commonwealth.

        Aswe read on we fail to recognize that no one is observing that the person who seemingly originated the story or who seem to know so much about the story before it reached the Dominican public has been distant from the story. Who wrote the story? The Editor is keeping that “whistle blower” close to his heart After all this is a story that has far reaching implications for the reputation of an otherwise outstanding Dominican personality who has made it big on the world stage. So far it appears that some anonymous person wrote the piece on information that was received according to the Editor by sources originating from senior regional officials. No name no warrant. But then Lennox Linton who broke the news to the Dominican public did identify the writer of the article. When other commentators levelled at the identified contributor for a poor report, the Editor of the publication denied it was the said person. Who is lying then? Lennox or the Editor of the publication. I have not heard Lennox recanted his exposure. Is he keeping to his word? Too big, or arrogant to accept he was caught with his boxers down – yet again? But then again, Lennox speaks “truth to Power” – always. He cannot be faulted.

  14. Gabriel St Jean
    September 30, 2014

    It bothers me when our Jacks and Jenny’s just don’t seem to be able to get it right. Is it a flaw with the understanding of the English language of just plain stupidity at the highest level; These semi-literates still think we live in the dark ages. What is this talk about “bashing” of the distinguished Dominican lady. If to question the merits or demerits of the contents of an article published by a Caribbean publishing entity is so offensive to be called bashing then we are really lost to the rest of the universe. I heard the leader of the UWP heap praises on the attributes of Baroness Scotland but stated clearly that if what was published in the article was in fact true then the blame must squarely be placed on the present Dominica Administration. He further stated that she would be an excellent candidate for that position; is that bashing? Why do these jacks-an-jenny’s think that our semi-literates who are hell bent on transgressing all forms of law and protocol should not be commented about. I long to see the day when commonsense and not (rear-sense) is the order of the day.

    • john paul
      October 1, 2014

      It is none of what you suggested it is about lies and deception to confuse and finally to profit from scams

    • October 1, 2014

      Gab,
      My elder brother always told me as a kid( when I mentioned the compound word commonsense) That it was a scarce commodity. Even we are miles apart and this word comes up I always smile realizing this guy was way ahead in foresight.
      Today when we speak & discourse DA on the phone ( and that ‘s often say once /week) He always reminds me of the aforementioned, adding it’s still scarce around these parts and our gov’t & opposition are a reflection of us.
      Love you bro!

      • Just Observing
        October 1, 2014

        Just observing your objectivity. Not that I agree with you, but at last you have stood out among the rest of us. Government might have lapsed in procedures on this one, but there is no reason for the opposition led total opposition to the nomination. Whilst Lennox might have have avoided going public and lead the charge (and for good reasons too), those of us who live here know who are the shirkers and jerkers, the playmakers, movers and definers of policy in the UWP. As far as the UWP is concerned, they cannot go on the public record to suggest that the lady is not eminently qualified. That would spell disaster for “cow girl” in St. Joe. But the fact that the goodly lady was nominated by PM Skerrit and that some person or governments in Caricom is opposed to the nomination and or strategy, the UWP must now fall in line and oppose simply on this point – simply because a supposedly influential voice in the region came up against PM Skerrit. We live here and we know their modus operandi. Go back and listen carefully to the Linton’s statement about “what might have influenced government to nominate her” Isn’t he casting aspersions and speaking to his followers.

        I agree we need to be more objective in our political discourse, but also to say it as it is. Common sense is really rare in our political discourse.

  15. What about Vince
    September 30, 2014

    A crucial part of the story has not been reported by DNO.

    “Dominica’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Vince Henderson, has also issued a similar statement, except he insists that “at no time was Baroness Scotland asked to leave any meeting”, which itself contradicts the CARICOM statement saying that she was in fact asked to leave as above.

    Vince Hemderson has said that at no time was Baroness Scotland asked to leave any meeting, while Caricom has said that candidate were asked to leave.

    Who is telling the truth and who is not?

    • Just Observing
      October 1, 2014

      Didn’t you also hear that when Lennox spoke to Matt on Monday morning he identified by name and surname the writer of the article? When other people levelled at the identified writer, later on the Editor forcefully denied it was the person. There is some suggestion that the writer’s name – the same person that Lennox identified was appended tothe article and later removed. He did not deny it when Lennox spoke very early in the morning. So who is lying? Lennox or the Editor?

  16. doh good
    September 30, 2014

    yeah u in guyana take that. now we see how big men act towards lack of communication or the lack of it…. let us see how this saga plays out

  17. Derick Gonsalves
    September 30, 2014

    People who seem now to be blaming caricom should lay the blame squarely at this clearly embarrassed and apparently less than bright editor fellow……..his responses are childish and quite frankly disrespectful….. He is now seeking with a tone which seems laced with contempt to ask caricom to answer questions that he SHOULD have asked before going to print……period….Accordingly it is my humble view that caricom clearly owes his publication no explanation whatsoever….In closing he arrogantly suggests that is caricom saying that senior govt ministers cannot speak for caricom???? Give the man a gold star finally he gets it no govt minister or prime minister has the right to speak on behalf of caricom unless specifically mandated by the council, chairman or sub committee of caricom. And all this serves to show sir is your level of unprofessionalism or ignorance or combination of both. Hopefully you learn from your serious poor judgement in this regard.

  18. Hmmm
    September 30, 2014

    Secretariat? Is that the name of a person or a title ? So is this person writing on behalf ofvthemself or Caricom.

  19. civil servaht
    September 30, 2014

    DNO make your position Known in this matter. Do you support the nomination of Baroness Scotland a Dominican citizen or do you support the bashing of the good Lady by this bias online news paper for political reasons.

    It is interesting to note that no other news outlet had taken on the story which is grossly innacurate

    ADMIN: We have no position on this matter. We simply report what is going on. We are reporting all sides of the story: from those who made the allegations, to those who countered the allegations, to CARICOM’s response to the allegations. When we first reported the matter, we described it an allegation.

    • CaraW
      October 1, 2014

      Amen DNO! Why should someone ask a news source to take a position? Lord!

  20. September 30, 2014

    Medard et AL my friends not Dominica, attempted to foist its nominee on CARICOM meetings, each with predictable results, We are led to question the state of mind of Medard et AL, not Dominicans per say:( the decision makers in the Dominican government that’s correct)in the context of Einstein’s theory of insanity. Well some people say it’s repeating the same mistakes and expect to get different results. It seems to have worked a lot for that Neo-DLP cabal. It work for their land transfer deal for a while until an article came out Million $ assets $5000.00 EC monthly salary by a radio talkshow host. It was resolved quietly after talk of suing surfaced. Now the joke is that announcer never spoke about the settlement( maybe court ordered lol) However this author of the article keeps the heat on every morning.
    The Bins cheaply purchase by a minister’s brother 1/2, 3/4 still a brother) outside the misty woods of PA was yet another.Readers can extraplot for the sake of space and time.
    Just this weekend there was an article in the NY times abou
    t Putin’s circle of flowers buddies like those of Medard.N.B am quoting my source no plagiarism acusation for John Doway )Names and worth of many people were mentioned along with photos. Just substitiute these flowers to our picture here on island.
    To be continued.

    • SHOE
      October 1, 2014

      You want more? :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

  21. Anonymous
    September 30, 2014

    The editor has asked pertinent questions….Caricom looks so foolish.

  22. natural dominican
    September 30, 2014

    The darkness…it must come out the light.

  23. 4 ALL to see
    September 30, 2014

    @ Gulfstream, was it the UWP that published this article or Caribbean News Now? FYI it was published by Caribbean news now and I don’t see why you want to blame it on UWP. Instead of playing chest on this one and since you seem to divert our attention, I encourage you to answer those four simple questions that Barry Randall, of “Caribbean News Now” posted to the secretariat. I hope you did not think it was published by Lennox Linton of Q95 because you guys are so blind and like to take pleasure in twisting facts.

    • Anonymous
      October 1, 2014

      Werll Lennox said on air that it was written by Rebecca Theodore and we all know where she stands. It is a UWP story.

      • A Doubting Thomas
        October 1, 2014

        Was the author of the article right there or did someone give the story and maybe something got lost or added in translation. A word comes to mind but I cannot remember the word as I write.

        Why wouldn’t the author want his or her name mentioned in such an important story, to be at the UN that would be a career highlight, just being there for any reporter or was the author supposed to be somewhere else for work purposes and not where the story supposedly took place? Like playing too back?

        Maybe the author’s name was removed after all the talala. Of course many writers do write under different names and we know that is not illegal, except

        The leader of the UWP told us who wrote the story but the Newspaper said it is not who the UWP leader said it is.

        Someone is not telling us the truth here either.

  24. September 30, 2014

    I’m so sick of this BS. Somebody is not telling whole truth. I do believe that something did happen at that meeting. But it must stay covered up.to protect someone and that is just my opinion.

    • October 1, 2014

      James Bond, You are so clear, itconcerns me why the hypocrites fail or are unwilling to admit it. didn’t they learn the all adage ;”There’s no smoke with fire?”

      • October 1, 2014

        without it was suppose to read. My bad.

  25. tim
    September 30, 2014

    Is it about country or protocol. If its about country then I would love to have her sit at an ALBA CONFERENCE. Is this possible? just asking.

  26. confused
    September 30, 2014

    If Dominica wishes to nominate Baroness Scotland for the post of Commonwealth Secretary-General she must resign from the British House of Lords and Prime Minister Skerrit must appoint her to a ministerial position in his Cabinet.

    What persons must understand is she cannot be a sitting member of the British Legislature and at the same time be attending meetings of Caricom with other Caricom Ministers where sensitive political and other issues are being discussed. The British Government would never invite a West Indian politician to represent it at a meeting of the European Commission or any such similar body. Not only would the European Commission object but the UK Government and Opposition would reject any attempt to do so.

    The question therefore is why has not the British Government nominated her for the post and why are they keeping quiet on the matter. Is it because they do not wish to nominate her in the first place and have taken a back road by asking Dominica to do so?

    The fact that she is Dominican born bears no relevance to the matter and those persons who keep on saying that she is qualified for the post are missing the essential point which is she is a sitting member of the British House of Lords representing the interests of the British Government. How is she going to change that? If the British Government wants to put her up as their candidate then that is what they should do and not put Dominica in the embarrassing position in which it now finds itself as a result of poor and wrong advice if that was the case.

    what she mu

    • The mouth
      September 30, 2014

      Would a UK Conservative Party Government nominate a member of the British Labour Party?

      Clearly Baroness Scotland needs the support of Dominica and CARICOM. I would be surprised if CARICOM heads of government will provide that support. Let’s see how long Baroness Scotland remains active in Dominican / Caribbean affairs if she isn’t nominated.

      • Me
        October 1, 2014

        Why does she need our support? She is first, and foremost British. It is the U.K. that pays for the lion share of the Commonwealth Office and surely she first needs support from the country where she is a member of parliament. I certainly wish her luck.

    • Femme San Joseph
      October 1, 2014

      Perhaps it might help to explain a simple fact about being a Member of the House of Lords. They form the upper house of the Parliament with the House of Commons forming the lower house. The members are of two types: hereditary and life peers. The hereditary have inherited their titles which can be passed on to their children. The life peers are members for life, their children cannot inherit their titles. It is normally given to someone for outstanding contribution in a particular field. In Patricia Scotland’s case it was after she was made the UK’s first black female QC and the youngest person to be made one in 200 years.

      She is not a member of the present Government. She holds no official position in either the Government or Opposition. Since 2010 when her party lost the election she has gone back to private practice. She is free whilst a Member of the House of Lords to hold this post or any other she wishes to accept.

      Baroness Scotland has always proclaimed her country and region of birth and used her considerable influence on its behalf. It has been done very quietly and in positive ways. If she gains the CARICOM nomination for this post, she will work on behalf of the region, if she does not she will work for it.

      The Prime Ministers of the Caribbean have three candidates to chose from. The choice should be made on who will command the support of most of the other 41 members of the Commonwealth and represent the Caribbean. It is not only on who the Caribbean approves of.

      • The Mouth
        October 1, 2014

        Your arguments are factually correct. However we are dealing with politics and therefore perception is key. I think we would agree that the UK Conservative Party hasn’t nominated a member of the UK Labour Party. Therefore the perception is that Baroness Scotland has reverted to her ‘birth right’ to gain this nomination. The original article appears to have been written by someone attending the meeting, and for all we know a country representative who has also made a nomination. But they have ‘hit the nail on the head’. Baroness Scotland has never worked for the Government of Dominica, another CARICOM country or a regional institution. The perception is that she is using the region.

        You are also correct that Baroness Scotland is free to choose and apply her profession. But since 2010 when her government lost the election, she has chosen to stay in the UK. She hasn’t shown interest in seeking the nomination to work for any regional institution, but one which would allow her to remain in the UK. She is more than well qualified and would be welcomed to work in many of our regional institutions.

        Lastly, you claim she has very quietly and positively used her influence for her country and the region. Doing things very quietly aren’t the best qualities for someone now seeking high office. The region needs leadership, we know she is qualified, but quiet leaders are not what we need now.

      • blood
        October 1, 2014

        i guess the mouth really dont know that she has worked wit the caribbean lol

  27. Anonymous
    September 30, 2014

    Baroness Scotland was NEVER Dominica’s nominee,.. she was nominated by the British who asked Dominica to co-sponsor her after their attempts with Baroness Valerie Amos (Guyanese born) failed!!!!!

    • Anonymous
      September 30, 2014

      In that case one must ask the question again. What was she doing at the U.N. as a member of a Dominica govt. team and in particular, attempting to attend a meeting of Caricom states?

    • Femme San Joseph
      October 1, 2014

      Baroness Scotland is Dominica’s candidate. The UK backed Baroness Amos for the post. Baroness Scotland independently sought and obtained the backing of the Dominica Government.

      Please do not assert facts without checking them thoroughly.

      • Me
        October 1, 2014

        I do believe you but then the question must be asked why she chose Dominica to put her candidature forward. It can only mean that she feels the U.K. would not support her and if so, why not? I hardly believe it has anything to do with politics but rather with blotting her copy book when she was convicted of employing an illegal immigrant in her private capacity breaking the very law she supported as the U.K.’s A.G. and embarrassing her adopted country. History can not be undone I’m afraid.

      • Ma Moses
        October 1, 2014

        So when it suit her she is British and when that fails her Dominican citizenship comes in handy?

  28. Just Observing
    September 30, 2014

    “Finally,” Randall wrote. “Just as you admonish us to corroborate facts before publishing, we urge you to do the same before issuing statements because the unavoidable conclusion to be drawn from your response is that senior regional ministers cannot now be relied upon to report events truthfully.” That is telling. Some “senior government minister” is giving false information. Mr. Randall you might want to scrutinize your sources – senior government minster or not. Who are the people (senior regional ministers) who stand to lose if Baroness Scotland, Dominica’s nominee is selected? the nominees we know so far – Antigua and Barbuda and whoever else is interested.

    • Papa Dom
      October 1, 2014

      Are you stupid or what? There are over 50 countries involved in the process. Who is to say that a caricom nominee whoever that is, will be selected? When are you people going to realise that skerritt is not God? These days not even Roman Catholics believe that the pope is infallible, so what is it about skerritt that everything that he does most of which are wrong is right in your eyes?

  29. Country First
    September 30, 2014

    The Secretariat should answer to Randall’s questions and analysis on the matter. It is not a UWP scandal, it came from the region. The baroness should know better than to have her name dragged into this controversy.

  30. Anonymous
    September 30, 2014

    So Randall do a rebuttal stating that “this is not the first time in recent months that Dominica has attempted to foist its nominee on CARICOM meetings…. On the first such occasion, Baroness Scotland appeared without prior notification as part of the Dominica delegation at the 17th meeting of the Council for Foreign and Community Relations (COFCOR) in Georgetown, Guyana, on May 20-21, 2014.” CNN made some concluding remarks which should be read from the editorial itself!!! http://www.caribbeannewsnow.com/topstory-Editorial%3A-Shooting-even-the-presumed-messenger-23000.html

  31. Anonymous
    September 30, 2014

    Randall you good but there is a twist, “….delegates who had been proposed as CARICOM candidates for the posts of Commonwealth Secretary General and Assistant Secretary-General of the Organisation of American States left the room as is normal procedure in such circumstances.” The statement is clearly saying that candidates for the 2 posts i.e (1) Commonwealth and (2) OAS were asked to leave. In other words it definitely not saying that ALL the candidates for the post of Commonwealth Secretary General were asked to leave. One should then ask was her presence at the CARICOM foreign ministers meeting an obvious attempt to promote her Commonwealth candidacy even though other CARICOM nominees for the post were not at the meeting?????

  32. Me
    September 30, 2014

    yesterday while after reading the article online I was very disappointed in the govt, I had no or limited knowledge of the protocol when the heads of caricom meet. Therefore I received the article and treated it as gospel. Sad and felt Dominica embarassed other caricom states I was hopping it was not true. But then the truth came ouT and I fully understood what happened it was for another Dominican to rise and give us some form of recognition. I got excited because no matter who it was, I saw a Dominican being nominated and if successful will make us proud.

    All I want to say to the readers have an open mind and lets stop being the crab at the bottom of the barrel, and help your self up by not pulling down another. We are Dominicans and need to be a little more patriotic.

    Thank you

    • Me
      September 30, 2014

      Please note this comment is not by Me. Usurpers are one rank below plagiarists.

  33. Anonymous
    September 30, 2014

    Barry Randall you good… and the punch line “…senior regional ministers cannot now be relied upon to report events truthfully”!!!! So who lying now

    • SXMer/Dominican
      September 30, 2014

      But didn’t I hear Vince on Caribbean Report stating that, the baroness stayed for the entire meeting.

      • Stamos
        October 1, 2014

        You did not hear that. Vince said he quietly told her to leave. She was not asked by anyone else to leave but HIM. Since they were going to discuss the part of the agenda concerning candidacy. This was so easy to understand and you people are still trying to create confusion in what Vince said. SAD

  34. @LIGHT
    September 30, 2014

    What is the fight really about? What are we fighting for? A prosperous Dominica, or to see people who we prefer to see in certain positions? ASK YOURSELF WHAT U REALLY FIGHTING FOR? AND WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF DOMINICA.

    NOW LET’S SEE IF THE ADMIN WILL DELETE THIS COMMENT.

    DOMINICA

    • Anonymous
      September 30, 2014

      There’s no fight…just people trying to pull wool over the eyes of others. when they stop doing that, we can “all get along”.

  35. September 30, 2014

    God when is this tongue lashing childish saga going to end. I am sick and saddened to see Dominicans fighting and making false accusations. Come on let us build over nation right now we are under appartied

    • Just Observing
      September 30, 2014

      Because some people go to bed wishing when they get up they hear a bad news about Dominica particularly if it involves a government minister, They twist and turn in bed, dream and keep dreaming on. When the sun comes up and the rasta on Q does not have a hate story about Skerrit, they look around the region for people including “regional senior government ministers and online newspapers to pacify their lost night of dreaming evil for Dominica at any cost.

    • Ma Moses
      September 30, 2014

      It is going to end when Skerrit’s rule ends. No sooner, no later!

      • Barbara Saunders
        October 1, 2014

        Ma Moses

        That’s the big mistake that some of us are making in Dominica. Attitudes and behaviours which are nurtured over time do not disappear overnight, so what we have been feeding our people over the years, particularly the young will come back to bite us.

        Unfortunately, that’s what we do not understand. We think we are hurting a small group of men but we are not my dear and woe be unto whoever reaps what was sown!

        Ever heard the saying “those who live by the sword will die by the sword”? think about it!

      • Ma Moses
        October 1, 2014

        Barbara, as things are I’m ready to take the gamble. We are already at rock bottom so there is little to lose and everything to gain with a new team. If it does not work it will only be for five years and if I have to suffer further under this regime it can not be worse with a next one.
        Yes, you shall reap what you sow and if you live by the sword you will perish by the sword but that applies to everybody equally, not so.

  36. Gulfstream
    September 30, 2014

    If I recall very well Baroness Scotland has being bashed before by UWP and its satellites when she was being also recommended for a similar position by the late Rosie Douglas.
    A leopard never changes its skin and instinct… it may be camouflaged but it still remains a leopard… and so this is UWP.

  37. AGAIN!!!!!!!
    September 30, 2014

    More Liars from this administration rather than admit they did not follow protocol and move on.

    They are trying to blame someone else for their misdeeds.

    Now Vince and Laroque ……. to shield the PM.

    Then the PM will never learn, his behavior will only get worse.

    • JoJo
      October 2, 2014

      Hahah, mr. Laroque’s goose may be cooked by backing Vince on this one. Some of the other Caricom members will be none too pleased. They are thinking that Skerrit is already pushing above his station as if he is the boss of all Caricom and they must be itching to teach him a lesson. Just my private thoughts!

  38. Anonymous
    September 30, 2014

    These politicians posing as media operatives and news organizations are being exposed one by one. Be careful DNO!!!!

  39. koro
    September 30, 2014

    I smell political coverup in high places…

  40. Anonymous
    September 30, 2014

    Many of these so-called online news outlets (and yes DNO included) have hidden political agendas and are masquerading as providing unbiased news to a rather unsuspecting public. No wonder the current leader of the UWP got away for so many years posing as a so-called ‘investigative journalist’ when he was in fact a full-fledged political operative. Leaves one to wonder how many more of these so-called media persons are really just political operatives masqurading as professonal media persons. But anyway less I say more before I am accused of attacking, musling or even trying to shoot or stiffle media freedoms ( since these guys like to hide under that cover to go about doing their mischief even when the FACTS are thrown right at their faces).

    • Dominican for Sure
      September 30, 2014

      Well said…..its become so apparent; they simply can’t hide anymore; Pretending to be Journalist, when they are Politicians – I sure I didn’t call the names of the two guys who speak on the “hot seat” every morning. 8)

    • icepop
      September 30, 2014

      At least you were aware who according to you the political activist is who has been hidding behind journalism- and he continues to hide in wide open spaces where you and others can easily find him and question him and even sue him.- but can the same be said for you – aren’t you hiding behind an anonymous name; isn’t your leader hiding behind the likes of the SC; ANIMAL PROGRAMME; and PB name a few; man it is time to be brave like the UWP leader and come out and hide in the open so that everybody can see and know you.

    • Me
      September 30, 2014

      Would you say that GIS provides unbiased news??

  41. Lang Mama
    September 30, 2014

    There are many people who were born and raised in England and are of Dominican parentage and these people speak the creole very very well. So what is the big deal about Scotland being able to say some things in creole.
    If she is a British parliamentArian she should not be so entrenched in our Foreign affairs.
    We need to stop the hypocrisy. We making all kind of silly excuses to impose Scotland – “she is Dominican by birth yardyyyy yardaaa” well right here in Dominica this government is victimizing people who have given their life to service of this country. We give Chinese preference over our own laborers and trades men. We give Chinese competitive advantage with import duties etc. The same government would do anything to keep Crispin down. So what the heck am I suppose to say give her the podition because she is Dominican. We had a very hard working young lawyer working in the office of DPP he applied for the job of magistrate and he was totally ignored. In fact he had to migrate because the same set of people chose the ex politician from Grenada Ali Gayle instead. Somebody tell me why I must now argue that Scotland is Dominican. Based on the Ali Gayle scenario I doh give a darn in fact I am routing for anybody particularly if that person has served in the region.

    I must admit though she look like a tough woman – is she a wrestler by any chance. Just asking Allah all you do blame me

    • Views Expressed
      September 30, 2014

      Lang Mama…I feel our pain and support your concerns. This has nothing to do with Baroness Scotland, she has just been unfortunately brought into the dirty corrupt melee of the politics of Skerrit, Vince etc. The more these guise disguise their hypocrite and stupidy they will remain dishonest in the eyes of Dominicans abroad and at home.
      Skerrit runs about and selects yes people………PLEASE BARONESS SCOTLAND…STAY AWAY FROM THESE PEOPLE….THE LIKES OF SKERRIT, VINCE……ASTAPHAN….EASY DOOR AND MANY OTHERS . THEY HAVE DONE THE COIUNTRY A DISSERVICE.

  42. Doc. Love
    September 30, 2014

    Dominica can no longer afford to be always in all that comess, whether it is at the United Nation or locally. In fourteen years aren’t Dominicans fed up with all those scandals. For instance, the case of the bin booball, Skeritt’s citizenship issue, the selection of a President, the Prime Minister having to sit in the doc to answer questions in a foreign court, land deals, $400,000 Skeritt’s residence, now a scandal in all places, the United Nations. I believe enough is enough, the beautiful people of Dominica deserves better.

    • Doc. Love
      September 30, 2014

      Typo: beautiful people deserve.

  43. Gulfstream
    September 30, 2014

    Great that the CARICOM Secretariat is therefore clarifying the circumstances that led to the occasion. Are you all now saying the Secretariat has no understanding and knowledge in international protocol?
    UWP is and has always being a political disaster, that’s why the party only stayed 4.5 years in government. Shame on you guys..

  44. Anonymous
    September 30, 2014

    Sounds like someone made a phone call to the CARICOM Secretariat in an attempt to diffuse that issue/matter to portray that all is well and that this in fact was/is a non-issue. Unfortunately, this particular media/online outlet was not at all intimidated?

    Why is UWP getting bashed for an article written by ” Caribbean News Now?”

    Why is the opposition accused of chastising the Baroness???
    They simply referenced the article and suggested that the Government issue a statement or respond to or explain the claims in the article (especially if it were to be true).. I never heard them say that she is not qualified or denigrate her accomplishments or qualifications etc.

    The Dominican Government have masterful way of “changing” the subject and or deflecting attention from the subject matter.

    This is not about UWP, it’s about an article from a foreign body, with certain claims/accusations which the Dominican Government simply needs to explain or address. I don’t see Team Dominica in this equation.

    Just address the issue…

    • CaraW
      October 1, 2014

      Interesting! I just asked the same question? Is there a relationship between the UWP and Caribbean News Now? SMH

  45. Yambabawoolais
    September 30, 2014

    La rogue must now answer the very pertinent questions. Which other candidate was present and how many excused.
    So Laroque is now implying that Scotland was not the only one ask to leave but she was asked to leave. Why the continuous lying.

  46. bigger
    September 30, 2014

    It is ironic that the opposition party in Dominica is anti government irrespective whether it is for the betterment of the country or not. There we have a highly qualify Dominican born lady being savaged by her own people what a shame instead they should join forces with the government in a show of unity to help strengthen the nomination of Baroness Scotland to the post of Commonwealth Secretary General Politics is destroying our beautiful country

    • Evolved
      September 30, 2014

      What about it you do not get?

      She is an active member of British Parliament – she is not a member of Dominica’s parliament nor is she a member of its diplomatic core.

      I am surprised that a woman of her calibre allowed herself to be drawn into this brawl – she should have allowed due process to unfold

      • Anonymous
        September 30, 2014

        Evolved, I get it but please diplomatic “corps”, not diplomatic “core”.

    • CaraW
      October 1, 2014

      Is Caribbean News Now a UWp publication? Why is the Opposition being blamed for the story?

    • afan
      October 1, 2014

      but this wasn’t started by the opposition, this is a news article reported by a news agency, where is the hand of the opposition?? deal with the fact that our government is so accustom in doing whatever they want, that they think they can do that outside of Dominica and escape…

    • JoJo
      October 2, 2014

      You are twisting things again. I have not heard or seen anyone savaging Baroness Scotland. On the contrary but is is Skerrit’s high handedness..AGAIN, that is being questioned and denounced.
      His behaviour does not help the lady at all but she is a well,educated grown woman who can take care of herself.

  47. September 30, 2014

    This Neo DLP/infiltrate/hybrid party of opportunists never fail to make us at home and n the Diaspora laugh!
    Skerro I feel for you my boy that’s what happen when little bit ah bouy join big man ting.
    With all dem big brain guys on you alls team still faux pax ing?Dr this Professor dat Ambassador Goobbles caricom reps, diplomatic experts Kaka sec you guys cannot do any thing right?
    I often wonder!

  48. September 30, 2014

    they trying to cover up,let us get to the bottom of it.

  49. You hear lie
    September 30, 2014

    One word, You got BALLS me Randall! I like that, I really like that!

  50. Evolved
    September 30, 2014

    Irwin Larocque – you are showing your partiality – shame on you – you know that what Dominica did was wrong – she should NOT have been there in the first place. SMH

    • Dominica for Sure
      September 30, 2014

      :( ….but where in the article did they mention Irwin Larocque name there? We Dominican are always quick to segment and polarize everything especially when it doesn’t suit us… leave the man out of it.

      • JoJo
        September 30, 2014

        irwin Laroque heads the Caricom Secretariat and since they support Vince Henderson’s version how can they be left out of this saga? Be real man.

      • Evolved
        September 30, 2014

        Dominica for sure

        who is the head of Caricom? Irwin Larocque.

        Anything that goes out from the Secretariat must be approved by him.

        The statement should have been balanced – it should not have taken sides. The decision by the Dominica Govt to have this woman there was wrong – they should have let due process unfold.

  51. west bank crew
    September 30, 2014

    How can a sitting member of british parliament have DA intrest at heart make no sense

    • blood
      September 30, 2014

      but yet u forget we are under the west minister system…lol u all are so full of it.

      • JoJo
        September 30, 2014

        You are wrong. We decided to be a republic, for better or worse and not have the English Queen as our head of State – we now have mr. Savarin instead and I honestly don’t know if that is an improvement. Secondly, Roosevelt Skerrit decided unilaterally to move us to the CCJ and the same comments apply. I would not be surprised if Britain are glad to be rid of us but anyway, that was our choice.

  52. .
    September 30, 2014

    It has become the norm, the uwp leader embarrasses himself, the uwp leader leaves the state, all the silent uwp members start talking then there is some scandalous news about Dominica in the international arena. Where there is smoke there is fire. check it out. This scandal has uwp written all over it.

    • RED 2 BLUE
      September 30, 2014

      you need a head check

      • September 30, 2014

        u like the minister of Health in reverse Blue 2 Red

      • September 30, 2014

        Hey Red 2 Blue you are as opportunistic as they come I just made a joke reversed ur comment .
        Now who needs de head check? RED is bad enough you turning blue you Fou? Try church lol or alcohol what about coke any form even bottled. Hey! almost forgot completely Medical Marijuana is a vailable even for recreational use too.
        Remember my cause in my penname. Okay?

    • coyote
      September 30, 2014

      really?

  53. Malgraysa
    September 30, 2014

    We must not forget that the Secretary General of Caricom is a Dominican national. I would not go as far as to accuse him of telling lies but it would be fair to assume that pressure would been put to bear on him to support Ambassador Henderson’s statement. One question: was Mr. Laroque present at the meeting in New York himself so that can corroberate mr. Henderson’s version of events?

    • September 30, 2014

      Ok JaimeA’s partner .I see you uping your writing again since jaime’ s anniversary of the Heart attack.

  54. VB
    September 30, 2014

    So the Caricom Secretariat and Ambassador Henderson are saying the same thing. The Caribbean Now publication seems to be the one with lack of comprehension.

    • afan
      October 1, 2014

      look like you can’t read and understand lol. this article clearly states that what vince said contradicts what the secretariat is stating…. vince is saying that the lady was never asked to leave the room when the secretariat itself is saying that she was asked to leave lol….. i suspect we don’t understand the truth when it suits us

  55. anony
    September 30, 2014

    DNO I’m disappointed that you chose to publish this article without fact checking it beforehand. Is this what the people of Dominica deserve?

    Seems like this news service is falling apart.

  56. Anonymous
    September 30, 2014

    Skerrit that do that!

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

:) :-D :wink: :( 8-O :lol: :-| :cry: 8) :-? :-P :-x :?: :oops: :twisted: :mrgreen: more »

 characters available