Antigua & Barbuda government proposes to buy out Digicel as dispute over spectrum sharing continues

The war between telecommunications company Digicel and the Antigua and Barbuda government is continuing with new pronouncements by Gaston Browne to now buy out the operations of the Irish owned company in St johns.

The Antigua government announced new initiatives in its ongoing battle to have the company and competitor Flow, of the British telecommunication giant Cable and Wireless, share the spectrum space with a state-entity.

Last month, Digicel defended its decision to secure a High Court order preventing the government from sharing any of the 850 MHz spectrum it has been allocated with the state-owned Antigua Public Utilities Authority (APUA).

But speaking on his privately-owned radio station, Prime Minister Gaston Browne said he believes that Digicel “is showing an inclination to have possibly a 49-51 percentage situation.

“That’s the sticking point because we want the majority,” he said, adding that if the Digicel officials are prepared to “look at the possibility APUA…acquiring Digicel Antigua then we may have a deal”.

Meantime, Dominican Senior Counsel Anthony Astaphan told radio listeners that the government is moving to amend the Telecommunications Bill so as to provide further protection for APUA.

Astaphan, who is among lawyers representing the Antigua government in the court battle, said the government is seeking to provide some level of protection for the only telecommunication company in the Eastern Caribbean, not owned by foreign interests.

“I agree with the position that there should be some protection because I have noticed coming from the Privy Council (Antigua and Barbuda’s final court) that …they accept that Parliament or the government may make decisions to ensure that private enterprises …or public enterprises that are locally owned are not wiped out by international competition, ” he said.

He added, “So that is something, with the Prime Minister’s specific permission, we will spend the next five to seven days looking at to see how best we can reformulate some of the provisions to give some protection to a local asset which is APUA and not open it up to the extent that they may or may not be unfairly prejudiced by having to comply with certain things.”

Astaphan said the proposed legislation would allow for the authorities to make an order that “spectrum already allocated to a provider should be distributed or shared with somebody else to create an even playing field in the public interest subject only to the condition of compensation…”

Earlier this month, the government said it expects the High Court matter involving the two foreign telecommunications companies objecting to the plan to share the 850 megahertz spectrum with the state-owned utility company to “be heard over several years”.

Digicel said that it had taken the legal action because it wanted to shield its customers from “significant service disruption and a negative impact on coverage”.

Flow has not made any official public comment on the matter.

Disclaimer: The comments on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of Inc. All comments are approved by before they are posted. We never censor based on political or ideological points of view, but we do try to maintain a sensible balance between free speech and responsible moderating.

We will delete comments that:

  • violate or infringe the rights of any person, are defamatory or harassing or include personal attacks
  • a reasonable person would consider abusive or profane
  • contain material which violates or encourages others to violate any applicable law
  • promote hatred of any kind
  • refer to people arrested or charged with a crime as though they had been found guilty
  • contain links to "chain letters", pornographic or obscene movies or graphic images
  • are excessively long and off-topic

See our full comment/user policy/agreement.


  1. REAL!!!!
    June 27, 2019

    In my view this dangerous precedency taken by a GOVT in an open market.

    Why would any INTL company interested in investing Antigua do so…when at any moment a GOVT can say something is unfair to facilitate an entity that it owns.

    This is the reason GOVT should employ the best people for the jobs, who are knowledge, capable of intelligent business foresight and proper strategy, instead of putting square pegs in wrong hole……” friends”

    This is surely not done in the best interest of the public.

  2. June 26, 2019

    It just goes to show that when government is both a player on the field and the referee, there’s no way to avoid conflict of interest.

  3. Annon
    June 25, 2019

    Tony seems to be involved in everything. So, what happens if there is no Tony?

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

:) :-D :wink: :( 8-O :lol: :-| :cry: 8) :-? :-P :-x :?: :oops: :twisted: :mrgreen: more »

 characters available

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.