Injustice says Green

Opposition Senator Ron Green
Ron Green

Sad, alarming and painful are just some of the words one United Workers Party (UWP) petitioner has used to describe a decision by the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court to dismiss an appeal in a matter involving Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit and Education Minister Petter Saint Jean.

The decision was handed down by Her Lordship the Honourable, Janice Pereira, on the general basis that the UWP petitioners did not provide sufficient evidence of the existence of French passports, which Skerrit and Saint Jean allegedly held.

However, Ron Green says the decision reeks of injustice.

“I want to compliment Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit on his ability and success in hiding the truth from the court. We go to the court for justice. Justice depends on trust and when you hide the truth, it means injustice. This seems to be one of the major weaknesses of our court system,” he said.

“Everybody, in and out of Dominica, knows the truth, but con men, tricksters, lawyers, leaders specialize in keeping the truth hidden from the curt and also from our people,” Green said.

He said the UWP will now move “to educate the people on the truth.”

“Three years and three months short a week, is what we have spent at an incredible high court and the appeal court is saying that the direct evidence in the hands of Skerrit and Saint Jean was not put into the court”, Green lamented.

According to Green, the issue of dual allegiance was only one of the matters deemed unfair in the 2009 general elections.


Disclaimer: The comments on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of Inc. All comments are approved by before they are posted. We never censor based on political or ideological points of view, but we do try to maintain a sensible balance between free speech and responsible moderating.

We will delete comments that:

  • violate or infringe the rights of any person, are defamatory or harassing or include personal attacks
  • are abusive, profane or offensive
  • contain material which violates or encourages others to violate any applicable law
  • promote hatred of any kind
  • refer to people arrested or charged with a crime as though they had been found guilty
  • contain links to "chain letters", pornographic or obscene movies or graphic images
  • are excessively long and off-message

See our full comment/user policy/agreement.


  1. Anonymous
    March 14, 2013

    i listened to Ron on the radio and he was really sad. he really expect to win. well its the CCJ they went for. so what next ron?

  2. veille case
    March 14, 2013

    but wait I not even hearing much about Mr joseph and peper. Is the PM they want to reomove. but who want joseph.
    Ron green go and enjoy your green card and stop being laughed at.

  3. lapplaine passe
    March 14, 2013

    congrates to mr pepper. Mr green your time has long passed by. give pepper a chance to do his thing nah and just show your support.

    go to bed with your head light. am sure your wife is advising you. your hold a green card, so why are you so bitter.

  4. March 13, 2013

    I am not reading the comment nor the posts. I would like to ask RON GREEN, what is the difference from Skerrit holding a French passport and himself, Ron Greene holding an American passport? Why is it okay for Ron Green to run for office, regardless to how old he was when he became a United States Citizen, and it is not okay for Roosevelt Skerrit?

    Ron Green, collect your social security benefits, if any, from the United States, leave Skerrit along.

    Allow the VOTERS voice to be heard.

    • Laplaine
      March 14, 2013

      Thank you very much, you hit the nail right on the head, its good for you , its good for him too .

  5. toma
    March 13, 2013

    Who knows, they were probably paid a large sum of cash, people will do anything to stay in power, anything even kill

  6. Laplaine princess
    March 13, 2013


  7. Frank Talker
    March 13, 2013

    It is indeed a sad day for all of us when even the Appeals Court, the custodian and safeguard of our freedoms and liberties, has turned its back on truth and relied on a comedy of errors made by a lower Court; on its unwillingness to correct that lower Court and what appears to be a desire to sit well with the ruling thugs. It is a fact that Skerrit and Saint Jean both held French pasports. A letter from Skerrit to the French authorities and published in the media clearly amounts to evidence that he held french citizenship and a passport. Skerrit himself admitted to obtaining French citizenship as a result of his mother and not of his own doing. Even if the lower judge did not compel Skerrit to reveal his passport to the Court, there still is an abundance of evidence that Skerrit was French. For the Appeal Court to now say that the petitioners did not show sufficient evidence, when evidence would probably have been sufficient if the passport was revealed, is a mokery and amounts to nonsense. It is now a fact that our Court system is unwilling to give a fair hearing to any complaint against the DLP. My fear is that this continuing behaviour by the Court may well breed civil discontent which may lead to a bypassing of litigation and a return to lawlessness.

  8. me
    March 12, 2013

    Mr, Green is lamenting on the result of the court whereas he did the same being illegal MP for years. Mr. Green you really have nerve.

  9. I DIE NU
    March 12, 2013

    Hear who talking about INJUSTICE….Ron Green…Mister sick.Mister forgetting when he was a minister in the time of uwp.Mr.probably had (3)three passports wee.Now he saying Skerrit hiding truth.Man let’s finish with that,Ron concience that beating him.

    • heart
      March 12, 2013

      No Ron realize that his political career especially one as a mp is over. Who so never like so.

  10. The truth
    March 12, 2013

    The battle for Laplaine lives on.

  11. March 12, 2013

    Whatelse is there to celebrate but dishonesty. We aremaking strides so why not celebrate the triumph of lies and deceit.

  12. ebeh look it
    March 12, 2013

    mr green it seems is skerrit that tell you to go an denounce your american citizenship? he can still go to guada or france, because he is still the prime minister, but on your side you have to apply again for a visa to enter America. who is the loser now. never dig pit for your brother, you will end up falling in it. it was alright when you went up from 95-2000 and 2005-2009, there was no problem, but because you lost you sit, you remember you have dual citizen. if you obtain it from you mom, so did mr skerrit. you lived in america, skerrit live and grow up in vielle case so how he become a french man, with french dual, and you remain a dominican with american dual. that is not adding up at all. anyway it is over and you just have to apply again for your american passport.

    • Tablet Coco
      March 13, 2013

      Ron needs to show us the proof that he renounced his US citizenship. We cannot take his word. Ron, you should just sit in a corner like “little Jack Horner” and let other members of the opposition who are not in a similar situation do the talking.

    • Laplaine
      March 14, 2013

      Tell it to him, not sure if he will understand because he is sick with Skerrit / Petter fever.

  13. Realistic opinion
    March 12, 2013

    Time is the greatest teacher.

  14. Anonymous
    March 12, 2013

    Ron, what is the retirement age in Dominica anyway??? Even if they bring it up to 65, folks like you, Eddo and Prevost are still long overdue for retirement. Just give it up bro and let a younger individual continue the fight. Time for you guys to just cut your losses and retire in peace. People will respect you more for that, than your never-ending hypocritical rantings

    March 12, 2013

    Mamo grinne chaplay still strong it run you all away from the court. So you better leave SKERRO and ST.JEAN alone.

  16. Jenny
    March 12, 2013

    i believe we need to stop bashing each other. Today is one tomorrow is the other. Selah

    • March 13, 2013

      I agree now it not time to be carrying on a dead end give it up RON and consentrate on moving forward educate the people give them the fact of what is going on against them this have to do with the people not party leaders so show yourself the bigger man let go and move on.

  17. That too shall pass
    March 12, 2013

    That too shall pass. It makes no sense crying over spilt milk. No matter what the circumstances, the truth will always remain the truth. Nothing lasts forever and who laughs last laughs the best.

    It was Labour, then it was Freedom, then UWP, then labour/Freedom and then labor again. What next then? Those who are happy today will be sad tomorrow and those who are sad today will be happy tomorrow.

    Be patient; with God all things are possible. He will not leave us comfortless he will bring us joy in the morning.

    Grenada just had a clean sweep. They can jump high they can jump low; what will be must be. No party rules for ever. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

    • Anonymous
      March 12, 2013

      While I may tend to understand where you are trying to come from, one thing is clear: the time for the likes of Ron, Eddo and Prevo is long gone and NOTHING (not even your hopeless wishful thinking) is gonna bring that back!!!!!!

      • That too shall pass
        March 12, 2013

        Don’t be niave. Mike, Rosie, Patrick, OJ and many more Labour MP’s are no longer in government but the Labour party is in power today.

        The likes of Ron, Eddo and others might not regain the seat of power but those who hold the reigns of power today will some day be vanquished and your opinions will change. This is life what goes up must come down.

      • maindesk
        March 13, 2013

        That is what they said about Compton in St Lucia

  18. AYE
    March 12, 2013

    I’m for truth, no matter who tells it. I’m for justice, no matter who it is for or against. I’m a human being, first and foremost, and as such I’m for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole.” MALCOLM x

  19. Anonymous
    March 12, 2013

    So long commentors all over calling, asking, begging for the UWP to focus on the next elections and to stop harassing Skerrit day in day out. You mean they still not listening?

  20. Peeping Tom
    March 12, 2013

    I cannot recall a moment in history when the UWPwee was gracious in defeat. This is no model for aspiring leaders. How can Sen. Green speak of “injustice” when the very document on which he seems to claim justice, the Constitution, does NOT support his case of trial and condemnation in the absence of proof of a crime?! What kind of justice does Sen. Green support then? Where does his understanding of justice originate?

    In reality, all sides can claim victory on this matter. The PM and Hon, St. Jean, for obvious reasons; the people of Dominica, for the fact that the Constitution has been upheld; and the UWPwee, for its steadfastness. Now, do not misinterpret me, steadfastness is not necessarily a good thing, but I think we must applaud the UWPwee for adding voice to a regional debate on dual citizenship.

    Nevertheless, I still do not understand why they pursued the case to this level even in the absence of proof that could stand up in court. I remain astounded by this decision. You cannot accuse me of an offence and then ask me to prove that I have indeed committed that offence. Ludicrous! The onus is on you to prove your case. So, how can Sen. Green now accuse anyone of “hiding” truth? Frankly, if anyone deserves this title is the UWPwee, for hiding the evidence of the infringement of which they accused the PM and Hon St. Jean. Any lay man could have advised the UWPwee that its case was doomed from the start because it had no evidence to hold in the court.

    It may very well be able in the court of public opinion to spin all sorts of tales and summon all categories of speakers to publicly claim that the PM and his minister were illegally elected. Yet, modern democracies are not built on street talk but on the rule of law. Unfortunately, for the UWPwee, it has failed, again, to grasp this very basic facet of our democracy.

    Now that the case is closed, let us all join hands tonight and celebrate. We have all won, something. (Of course, the colour code for tonight’s function is red. Then again, we all have red flowing through us.)

  21. March 12, 2013

    Ron, by now perhaps you heard; “what goes around comes around” I call that the “the Boomerang effect!”

    What is a boomerang?

    It’s a toy; nevertheless; no matter in which direction we throw it, and how far; the boomerang always return to its place of origin.

    And you should know that is back into our faces.

    I mean there is no need for you to dwell on this thing when you probably knew you and your colleague had zero chances of winning your case. In a court of law even in the kangaroo courts of Dominica, and some parts of the Caribbean, cases are debated based on the physical evidence presented.

    Your case had absolutely no merit from the word go, because you fail to meet your burden of proof!

    You hope that political rhetoric, and the empathy, and the sympathy of the court would help you through, well that would be some biasness on the part of the court. Your lawyers screwed you; you see, they took your money knowing that you had no case from the beginning, they should have told you that without the physical; the solid passports of the two defendants Skerrit and Petter, presented in evidence, your alternative was to simply withdraw your petition.

    The only way you and company could have won your case was if Petter, and Roosevelt decided to stab themselves in their back, and walk into the court and admit to your allegations: in other words becoming a witness against themselves. Now if in the Common Law System, a wife cannot testify against her husband under normal circumstances in a court of law, I do not see how the defendants could have become your witness against themselves, except if the went in and simply pleaded guilty.

    On the other side of the equation I do not understand why you took these people to court for an alleged offence which you have also committed, assuming that Roosevelt, and Petter violated the nation constitution by serving in office whilst they have sworn allegiance to a foreign, and a none Commonwealth nation.

    You Ron have done precisely the same thing, because all the years you served in the Edison James administration, you were a citizen of the United States, which is not a member of the British Commonwealth of Nations. What is good for the goose Ron is also good for the gander!

    You know you broke the laws of our country, that is why prior to the last general election when you thought you had a chance of becoming Prime Minister, you ran to the American Embassy in Barbados where you denounced your American citizenship.

    You would be better off if you simply left it alone, because you would still maintain your American status, by which you could have collected your social security benefits, if you worked for ten years here and contributed to the system, now I doubt you can get anything since you are no longer a citizen of the country.

    Stop crying over spilt milk man and go on with your life, leave the politics to a younger generation; let Skerrit defeat come at the poles and through the ballots; do not try to take the man’s crown by force and in a court of law. Right this day he seems unbeatable, I do not know for tomorrow!

    You speak of injustice, I see no injustice, I simply see a lack of evidence which you failed to produce.

    Francisco Etienne-Dods Telemaque

    • Blood
      March 13, 2013

      Dodds: A boomerang is not a toy. It’s a weapon that always returns to the thrower.

  22. Met-Yo
    March 12, 2013

    He who is without sin Ronald Green….Cast the first stone……..Stupes

    • Met-Yo
      March 12, 2013

      Was it unjust when you were and “illegal” MP and Minister of Education in 1995 – 2000? If you agree pay back your salary in its entirety to the Treasury……SMDH these politicians….my god

  23. Blessed
    March 12, 2013

    UWP must come to realize that Dominica is absolutely majestically bright :oops: RED. Even if PM had lost the case, DA would go the polls again and guess what it would be the shoe again……and again….and again…and again…… :oops:

  24. Anonymous
    March 12, 2013

    So many of you labourites can admit it seems, that you know Skerrit is guilty but there was not sufficient evidence to prove it in a court of law. Yet, you are cheering victory. You are cheering that your party got away with it. Got away with deliberately and willfully breaking the constitution. So that makes all of you just as dishonest as Skerrit. Go cheer that and pray it away in your church.

  25. Solo
    March 12, 2013

    While I appreciate that Ron is hurt and wounded by this defeat and may be grasping at straws now, I`m still disappointed in that statement. As a former member of Government, current member of Opposition and essentially a law maker, he should know that justice has nothing to do with truth. Justice is about what you can prove! Unfortunately, this is not the same as truth, because if it was then there`d be no need for lawyers. The fact of the matter remains that there was insufficient evidence presented to prove the Opposition`s case….simple!

    Ron and the crew should take heed. We`re closer to a new election than we are to the last one and they should focus their energy on increasing their votes in the new election!

    • Mamizoo
      March 12, 2013

      I guess nurse James got justice because truth was hidden from the court. As a human being of supposed morality what is important to you . Forget about the courts. Are you prepared to tell your kids that Petta and SKERRIT are honorable men and that they stand for truth. Are you prepared to tell your kids that truth does not matter as long as you can get away with a crime.
      This is beyond politics my friend. We can go around in circles and argue for or against the courts decision but the end of it all we all have a solemn responsibility and that is to uphold morality in our society, communities, families , churches. This is beyond party line, beyond religion. If we implore honesty from our children why must we cheer on is honesty and criminal behavior from politicians.
      God I hope that the thumbs down that I will receive will not come from those who profess god fearing disposition; I also hope that the thumbs down will not come from people who earnestly want their children, nieces, nephews, grand children , godchild to be law abiding and to not think that it is ok or is entitled to wrong doing as long as he or she can get away.
      While there is a call to put the matter behind and move on we must carefully examine what it is left in our backyards.
      When the soviet union pulled out of Afganisan the world was happy; The land mines left behind is what took the lives of many innocent Afghan children. So when we believe that we have moved on with the matter be sure that the land mines left behind will torment our society for as long as we won’t clean up the mess.

      • still
        March 12, 2013

        Was it justice and morally right when Mr Green held office as an American citizen. we keep crying for justice when it suits us. Based on what you have said Mr Green cannot be perceived as honourable because for years he has been in the same position 1and it was fine because he could get away with it. why didn’t he bring forth those arguments when he was a minister? I guess back then moral standards were different. whilst I agree that there are issues that needs to be addressed please stop crying about justice and morals. they are al guilty of the same offence so he has no moral legs to stand on. You cannot say that he did not know that. their approach to the case and their demands said it all. In the prime ministers case they wanted the loosing candidate to replace the candidate to replace him but in la plaine they were calling for fresh elections. The question is why? it is simply because he knew he was just as guilty of the crime he was accusing his opponent of. how is that morally right and honourable. now please explain to me in which justice system i1s one forced to give evidence if they are accused. I’m guessing only in communist countries. are you saying that we should emulate justice systems where persons are forced to give evidence against themselves. If such precedence was set in this case then it would open up a huge can of worms because prosecutors and plaintiffs in every other case could force defendants to testify under oath. one da1y you could face the courts and your lawyers would have no say in whether you give evidence but the prosecution would. when you face the court you are given three options. 1. you may give evi1dence under oath which can be used in deliberations. 2. you can give an unsworn statement which does not have much weight or 3. you may choose to remain silent. The choice made is dependent on your discussions with your attorney. There is only one exception where the burden of proof lies with the defendant and that is in cases of financing of terrorism and money laundering and we have 9/11 to thank for that. so please tell me what land mine would you want to leave behind? It seems like no law no constit1ution will prevent either side from attempting to achieve what they desire.
        We need to stop letting politicians play games with us! They are all the same. at the end of the day it is all about being in power and enjoying the benefits associated with it.

  26. Prodigal
    March 12, 2013

    Ron You lost. Move on. Spend your time trying to help govern.

  27. ever
    March 12, 2013

    i no my pal rep would win congrats to u n continue GODis with ui loe u all the way from guada

    • IPO
      March 12, 2013

      Is that french or patois

    • true dominican
      March 12, 2013

      hahahaha…what kind of language is that?……ingglish or English?

    • March 12, 2013

      it’s time that some Dominicans stop using GOD for their selfish ways because we will pay the price if you say that you believe in the almighty father you would always always put him above any other but as one of those false believers you fail to up hold the CONSTITION which is the law of the land, time will tell.

  28. Just Looking On
    March 12, 2013

    Mr Green, you were in parliament for 2 consecutive terms as a dual citizen.. wasn´t it good for you? You of all people should not talk about injustice because you perpetuated injustice during your tenure in parliament. Don´t you have any shame? You are so boldface! My advice to you, Mr Green, is remove yourself once and for all from the business of politics because you are no role model for us the youth of this country! Good redence to you!

    • jamal
      March 12, 2013

      Read and understand dumbo: from the constitution (you can verify)

      Disqualifications for Representatives and Senators. 
      1. A person shall not be qualified to be elected or appointed as a Representative or Senator (hereinafter in this section referred to as a member) if he-
      a. is by virtue of his own act, under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience or adherence to a foreign power or state;

      Ron left Dominica at age 11 and became a US citizen, not by his own act. So, to this day he could still be a citizen of the US and run for office in DA.

      • March 12, 2013

        Jamal, are you that bias? I am sure you heard that it was the PM’s mum who filed for him to gain French citizenship while he was a baby. So how is that different from that of Ron Green’s case. Furthermore, the PM has lived his entire life in D/A.

      • Grammar Cop
        March 12, 2013

        Really? Because I was at Court in September 2011 when in Judge Gretel Thom presence, Mendes declared (to the shock of many present) that La Plaine would have to have a re-election because Mr. Green was as unqualified as Mr. St. Jean since he had not done the necessary paper work to renounce his US citizenship in time for the election. So, who is the ‘dumbo’ now?

      • Sunrise
        March 14, 2013

        Grammar Cop must have been asleep in Court. The issue is holding and using a Passport not only Citizenship (if held as a result of parents)— and for those who wish to know it was a Courtcase settled in Jamaica in March 2009 that determined this. So before March 2009 there was no morality failure, deception or illegality to serve if your Citizenship was not of your own hand. Now that the Case has ended are we satisfied Leaders who boast moral weaknesses, deception and illegality proved or not in the Courts?

  29. Friskers
    March 12, 2013

    DNO,page 25 of the judgment is missing.

    ADMIN: That is no fault of ours. We posted what was sent us. However, we will ask the relevant authorities to send us the missing pages.

  30. grell
    March 12, 2013

    people stop the fighting makes no sense,lets look forward to whats best for our country.

  31. Anonymous
    March 12, 2013

    hats off to my p.m and to my pal rep i love u

    • March 12, 2013

      It’s so sad when something is so wrong to be so right for some Dominicans our CONSTITION have been demolished and folks are rejoying what gives.

  32. Faceup
    March 12, 2013

    Ron it is six in the evening,go to bed bro, stop being a laughing stalk, respect your self ..

  33. hunting season
    March 12, 2013

    ron you dont worry one day will come when this world that they live will roam. Dominica has no justice and that was unfair but have patient chevez did more than that and god took him out have faith and let god have his way

    • Just Looking On
      March 12, 2013

      Hunting season, your time will come too! What you wish for others will come back and hunt you! Some people are so gullible!

    • concern
      March 12, 2013

      You are a fool to think only only certain people die we all have to die we are just passing throughso stop it .

      • Yak
        March 12, 2013

        Chevez thought he was too high and mighty to die; and there are many like him who have that same mentality.
        You have to learn to read between the lines.

  34. Flying Saucer
    March 12, 2013

    I think all benefits owed to Ron should be suspended due to the fact that he served illegally while in government.

  35. bullcrop
    March 12, 2013

    stop crying over spilled milk…get another topic…u honestly expect the man to condemn himself by bringing in evidence…the onus is on you to have your evidence or in the absense of EVIDENCE THAT IS THROWN ALSO IN THE GABBAGE BIN…

  36. joy
    March 12, 2013

    heard Mr James on Q95 this morning going on and on,i want him to remember it was not aDominica court who rule it was not even a labour court .it was ECCJ. What were they suppose to do tell the court,UWP will not agree so we can’t accept the ruling. It was thrown out now for the second time for lack of evidence, that’s it.You guys did not do all you homework,go back to the classroom and come again

    • Anonymous
      March 12, 2013

      @ joy, stop been so naive. Is there much difference in whethere it was a Dominica court, labor court or ECCJ, eductae yourself on the way the system works then I guess you will understand.

  37. A genuine Dominican
    March 12, 2013

    If only the UWP had conceeded to defeat at least the second round of elections, they could regroup and then maybe, if maybe they would have a chance of winning. Hehe. But no, those stubborn goats just keep ramming and ramming the Red Train to no avail. They tried via the electorial system, did not budge, so they go through the courts. Still hoping to infiltrate. Until now they are yet to learn the HARD and DIFFICULT way. UWP time to change your strategy, because this is working against you! Haha *_~

    March 12, 2013

    well, well, well,

  39. March 12, 2013

    men shush it”allu,dead..dead mi say”

  40. Anonymous
    March 12, 2013

    Mr.Green u will always have my respect and always be my Parliamentary Representative in La PLAINE!!!WHO VEX LOST!!!! U have mroe integrity and respect than these men can even dream of!

    • Me
      March 12, 2013

      Integrity??? How come a man with so much integrity can take someone else to court for the same sin he is guilty of? I have only one word for Mr. Green. Hypocrite!!!

    • La Plainian
      March 12, 2013

      Well, it’s too bad that he is YOUR parl rep, because in the House of Parliament, the MP for La Plaine is Peter Saint Jean. So, why should anyone be “vexed” as you say? Sometimes, I really wonder is people like you think before the write these things!

      • .......
        March 12, 2013

        So La Plaine has 2 parl reps? I swear there’s one named Petter St Jean.. as you were

    • Just Looking On
      March 12, 2013

      You are entitled to your opinion! And obviously, you seem to be the one who is vexed and lost. lol Some people… smh

  41. Anonymous
    March 12, 2013

    Correct me if I’m wrong. Ron Green is calling this an injustice. Isn’t this the same Ron Green who contested general elections as a dual citizen and won. Isn’t it the same Ron Green that only denounced his US citizenship before the last general elections. How is it any different? Poor guy. He’s probably feeling stupid that he gave up the citizenship and didn’t win the election

  42. BS
    March 12, 2013

    All of you labourites go to hell. You all are calling damnation on your own selves. People like you guys will do anything to get what you all want. Dominica is more than a republic. The philosophies of Machiavelli are being utilized by that damn PM but all you too damn blind to see that. He will do anything to attain power even through evil acts. The clock ticking. Time will tell.

  43. Lougaoo Mem
    March 12, 2013

    On August 4th 1857, West Indian Emancipation Day, in Frederick Douglas’ speech, he said, “Find out just what any people will submit to, and you have found the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or both”. West Indians, this is quite prophetic for the people who feel it in 2013 eh.

    Nelson Mandela said on July 1st 2005, “Poverty is not a gesture of charity. It’s an act of justice”.

  44. jaz
    March 12, 2013

    Ron please STOP it,

    • STUPES
      March 12, 2013

      one day u labourite will be sucking salt, time will tell, i wonder if u have good health insurrance dumb.

      • Anonymous
        March 12, 2013

        AndStupes, what will you be sucking at that point in time? SMH

      • Truth
        March 12, 2013

        You will be sucking salt to we dummy :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: Because I’m singing: ‘when the rain falls it don’t fall on one man’s house’

      • TALKSHOW
        March 12, 2013

        we will all be sucking salt together

      • lisa
        March 12, 2013

        well we will suck salt if is that we have and you will be sucking sugar. so enjoy your sugar and we will enjoy our salt.

  45. WhoCares
    March 12, 2013

    I believe one of the maxims of laws says its not what one knows but what one can prove. Also as a matter of law, their is a difference in the terms proof and evidence.

  46. Anonymous
    March 12, 2013

    The Court of Appeal was unanimous in its decision.There can be no further appeal in this matter.This is the Rule of Law and the law of the Constitution of Dominica.But,nevertheless, are there other legal authorities and learning from other common law jurisdictions that could persuade us that our appellate Court was wrong?Should this not be the focus of those who hold that the ECSC Court of Appeal is wrong.Or should we just lambaste the Court and its decisions here on on the dominant Talk Show?

  47. Anonymous1
    March 12, 2013

    Grave injustice by the Appeals Court. Is this a reflection of the CCJ? I was of the view that the CCJ should become our final apellate court, but now I am totally against it.

  48. Anonymous
    March 12, 2013

    Ron Green have guts boy.

  49. lisa
    March 12, 2013

    but Mr Green you not easy, you taking someone who has power in their head to court and you expect them to give you the evidence to end their reign of power? If you taking me to court you have to come with all your evidence. Don’t say I owing you and take me to court with nothing to show for it and expect me to bring the promissory note.

  50. Jokes
    March 12, 2013

    Lmao! I guess you don’t know That if you present the case u also present the evidence. Lol were they supposed to build the uwp a case?

  51. soufriere massive
    March 12, 2013

    stop being a hypocrite Ron!! smdh

    March 12, 2013

    Ron, why didnt you tell the public that you had dual citizenship since you first contested General Elections in 1980? Where is the justice you are crying out for?

  53. Dvt
    March 12, 2013

    Ron have guts

  54. As if....
    March 12, 2013

    Stupes:-? Give it a rest nah :roll:

  55. Anonymous
    March 12, 2013

    how long…??? not long… the day will arrive…
    the sad thing is d/cans are going to celebrate tonight, yet PWC can’t get paid and yet, they’ll go and eat, drink and be merry… and hail to a ‘king’… who have none of their interests at heart… while reading a social media post… a young man hinted that dominica is a democratic country (where free will and freedom of speech lives) but it is a sovereign republic… and hinted to our national anthem which says pledge allegiance to the sovereign republic for which it stands… and every republic has a ‘king’… interesting!!! so skerro has all right to act as a royal highness because our system of gov’t supports it… we aren’t answerable to England but to king skerro or any p.m at the time… interesting again…

    • Anonymous
      March 12, 2013

      i meant….. ‘a young man hinted that dominica “ISN’T” a democratic country’

    • Nurse
      March 12, 2013

      Nowhere in the national anthem is there any reference to “sovereign republic for which it stands”. Wheel and come again. I think you meant the Pledge of Allegiance

    • lisa
      March 12, 2013

      That’s still our choice and you have to dam well respect our choice. When we hungry am sure you are not the one who we will look up to for food and water. Respect our opinion.

    • hope
      March 12, 2013

      really? This is your analysis of the whole matter? Come on! if you going to analyse, then at least get the skill! stupzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    • Truth
      March 12, 2013

      All is welcome to the celebration, that includes you too

  56. IPO
    March 12, 2013

    DNO, DNO, please do us a favour, can you ask Ron Green for the readers sake, when did he renounce his US Citizenship and how long has he been serving as a Parliamentarian?

    • Anonymous
      March 12, 2013

      Excellent question!
      Now the shoe is on the other foot, Ron saying it squeezing….well, well, well.

  57. carrotop
    March 12, 2013

    Just plain corruption!!

  58. Too Hard Too Long
    March 12, 2013

    Is this the same Ron Green who held dual allegiance for several elections? Is this Ron Green who is talking about Dual allegiance being UNFAIR in the 2009 elections, the same Ron Green who was part of the UWP when they won elections to remove the Freedom Party government in 1995?

    My people, several posters here keep saying that two wrongs don’t make a right. Well, I have my own point of view here. Ron Green and and others before and after him set the precedent that dual allegiance is acceptable (even though it is in the constitution). It was acceptable for years before Skerrit. What was so special about the 2009 elections that made it unfair? The 18-3 victory? Would it have been unfair if the margin was lower as what happened in the previous elections?

    Honestly, I fail to understand why Ron of all people, is even commenting on this issue, an issue in which he himself had benefited from the precedence on a number of occasions.

    I am not DLP nor UWP. Elections coming up soon. Both sides need to establish more credibility in my eyes, but on this issue, UWP has no credibility. Pick another issue to bring to our attention and I will listen.

  59. Rachel
    March 12, 2013

    Mr. Green should be the last person making comment on this issue when he served the La Plaine constituency for years with dual citizenship. Mr. Green is it because the affiliation is French and not the USA? What is good for the goose is good for the gander. It’s over, move on!

  60. s
    March 12, 2013

    time to move on mr green ,now its time for uwp to come up with a new plan of action for the country for next election because if u guys keep fooling around labour will sure win again :)

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

:) :-D :wink: :( 8-O :lol: :-| :cry: 8) :-? :-P :-x :?: :oops: :twisted: :mrgreen: more »

 characters available