![\"\"](\"https:\/\/dominicanewsonline.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/pexels-markus-winkler-1430818-30855417-1-642x428.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The United States Supreme Court announced today that President Trump’s broad, global tariffs are unlawful and cannot be upheld without Congressional approval.<\/p>\n
This ruling, delivered by a 6-3 majority, marks the most significant legal setback for Trump at the High Court, said an LA Times article.<\/p>\n
Although the justices previously issued temporary orders last year to block some of his policies, this decision is the first to explicitly conclude that the president exceeded his constitutional authority in imposing those tariffs.<\/p>\n
Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, one of Trump’s appointees, authored a 46-page concurrence emphasizing Congress’s primary role in lawmaking. He stated, “The Constitution lodges the Nation\u2019s lawmaking powers in Congress alone,\u201d he said,\u00a0adding that although the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 grants certain authorities, it did not clearly authorize the sweeping tariff powers Trump sought.<\/p>\n
According to the article, Trump initially argued that his fluctuating tariffs would generate trillions in federal revenue and promote domestic manufacturing. However, manufacturing employment has declined over the past year, partly due to increased costs for imported components, which have burdened American companies.<\/p>\n
Critics contended that the tariffs disproportionately hurt small businesses and led to higher prices for consumers. In response, several small business owners filed lawsuits last year challenging the legality of Trump’s import taxes, claiming they were both unlawful and harmful.<\/p>\n
These legal challenges involved two cases in lower courts where plaintiffs prevailed. The courts pointed out that the 1977 law cited by Trump\u2014the IEEPA\u2014does not explicitly mention tariffs and had not previously been used to impose such import taxes.<\/p>\n
The law authorizes the president to address “unusual and extraordinary threats” by freezing assets or sanctioning foreign entities, or regulating trade in response to a national emergency.<\/p>\n
The article states that Trump asserted that the long-standing U.S. trade deficit constituted such an emergency, justifying the use of tariffs as a regulatory measure.<\/p>\n
However, both lower courts rejected Trump\u2019s claims but maintained the tariffs in place while the government appealed the cases to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, NBC News reports that the ruling does not impact all of Trump’s tariffs, as certain measures, such as those on steel and aluminum, imposed under different legal authorities, remain in effect.<\/p>\n
However, it overturns tariffs in two specific areas: The first involves country-specific or \u201creciprocal\u201d tariffs, which vary from 34% for China to a 10% baseline for other nations. The second pertains to a 25% tariff that Trump imposed on certain imports from Canada, China, and Mexico, citing their alleged failure to limit the influx of fentanyl.<\/p>\n
Notably, this decision invalidates many of Trump\u2019s tariffs but leaves some untouched. He may still attempt to reimpose certain tariffs through alternative legal channels. Just days before the ruling, Trump expressed concern over the potential invalidation of his tariffs.<\/p>\n
\u201cWithout tariffs, this country would be in such trouble right now,\u201d he stated.<\/p>\n
As of mid-December, revenue generated from tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) had totaled approximately $130 billion, as per the latest data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection.<\/p>\n
Trump, however, has claimed that the figures are much higher, suggesting up to $3 trillion, by including trade deal arrangements negotiated during his administration.<\/p>\n
Latest reports, according to FOX News, are that Trump’s response to the decision is a promise to double down.<\/p>\n
“Other alternatives will now be used to replace the ones that the court incorrectly rejected,” Trump said during a White House press briefing Friday afternoon. “We have alternatives. Great alternatives. Could be more money. We’ll take in more money, and we’ll be a lot stronger for it. We’re taking in hundreds of billions of dollars. We’ll continue to do so.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The United States Supreme Court announced today that President Trump’s broad, global tariffs are unlawful and cannot be upheld without Congressional approval. This ruling, delivered by a 6-3 majority, marks the most significant legal setback for Trump at the…","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":357168,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_cbd_carousel_blocks":"[]","footnotes":""},"categories":[235,6,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-357166","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-homepage-carousel","category-international-news","category-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n