16-pound baby born in Texas; measures two-feet tall

The baby

The average weight of a newborn baby is about 7 1/2 pounds, which is why it’s shocking — even in Texas — that a woman has given birth to a 16-pound baby boy.

Two feet tall at birth, JaMichael Brown is the biggest baby ever born in the state of Texas.

“A lot of the stuff we bought him is too little,” mother Janet Johnson told The Today Show.

The nurse who helped deliver JaMichael said there are health implications for an infant this large.

The medical term for large infants is “macrosomia,” literally meaning “large of body.” These babies often have high blood sugar at birth, and a greater chance of obesity or diabetes later in life, doctors say.

How big is possible cause for concern? According to Babycenter.com, over 9 pounds and 15 ounces is considered “much larger than average.”

From Babycenter:

Probably the most influential factors are genetics and unmanaged high blood sugar levels from gestational diabetes or diabetes mellitus. Other factors believed to increase risk include ethnicity (Hispanic women are more at risk), obesity, gaining a lot of weight during pregnancy, going past your due date, and even your baby’s sex — male babies are more often than females.

Copyright 2012 Dominica News Online, DURAVISION INC. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.

Disclaimer: The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of DominicaNewsOnline.com and its parent company or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by DominicaNewsOnline.com. We never censor based on political or ideological points of view, but we do try to maintain a sensible balance between free speech and responsible moderating.

We will delete comments that:

  • contain any material which violates or infringes the rights of any person, are defamatory or harassing or are purely ad hominem attacks
  • a reasonable person would consider abusive or profane
  • contain material which violates or encourages others to violate any applicable law
  • promote prejudice or prejudicial hatred of any kind
  • refer to people arrested or charged with a crime as though they had been found guilty
  • contain links to "chain letters", pornographic or obscene movies or graphic images
  • are off-topic and/or excessively long

See our full comment/user policy/agreement.

10 Comments

  1. sunshine
    July 29, 2011

    she had a c-section….

  2. Anonymous
    July 21, 2011

    Wonder if she had prenatal care or seeing a doctor during her pregnancy…I find it hard to believe a medical provider would allow her to deliver such a large baby.

  3. Jenny from da Block
    July 14, 2011

    I hope they properly monitor this baby’s progress to avoid any further serious complications. however it’s sooo scary to think that the mother had a vaginal delivery….lol papa met…she mussa scream like a banshee.

  4. ok
    July 14, 2011

    You mean she delivered that baby? OMG I was looking to see if it was a c-section. OMG that lady have a hole.

  5. Truth,Justice,Peace
    July 13, 2011

    I know of someone who had a 13 pound baby boy. I have heard of babies who weighed a little more. From time to time we do hear of a 16 pound baby but they are few and far in between. I am wondering what did the mother eat and drink during pregnancy. I do hope that this baby will be properly monitored for the symptoms as stated.

  6. Praying
    July 11, 2011

    I thought low blood sugar was what macrosomic babies have

    • Anonymous
      July 12, 2011

      no dear …its high

      because of the high blood sugar from the mother… there is as increase in transfer of nutrients which speeds up metabolism causing a big baby

      however, because of the high circulating sugar, the baby attempts to lower it by producing a chemical called insulin

      after births, the high levels of insulin can lead to low blood sugar in the baby

      • politbureau
        July 15, 2011

        so they end up hypoglycemic , not hyper.

    • Alas
      July 12, 2011

      macro is larger
      micro is smaller

    • politbureau
      July 15, 2011

      quite correct

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

:) :-D :wink: :( 8-O :lol: :-| :cry: 8) :-? :-P :-x :?: :oops: :twisted: :mrgreen: more »

 characters available