United Progressive Party response to Minister of Tourism’s statement about environmental concerns over airport project

Joshua Francis, Denise Charles

The United Progressive Party has reviewed the recent press release issued by the Minister of Tourism, Mrs. Denise Charles-Pemberton, regarding ongoing government projects and environmental concerns. While we acknowledge the Minister’s attempt to address the national outcry, her statements reveal a troubling disconnect between rhetoric and reality that demands immediate correction.

 

On Environmental Protection as a “Central Pillar”

The Minister’s claim that environmental protection forms the central pillar of government policy rings hollow against the backdrop of current realities. The evidence contradicts this assertion. Our rivers are being choked with sediment, our reefs are dying, our watersheds are under attack, our forests are being cleared without adequate safeguards, and our marine ecosystems are under unprecedented assault.

 

On Jobs and Economic Opportunity

The Minister fails to address a fundamental truth: sustainable economic opportunity cannot be built on the ruins of our natural resource base. The farmers who depend on healthy watersheds, the fishermen who rely on thriving marine ecosystems, the tour guides who showcase our pristine natural assets—these Dominicans are watching their livelihoods being destroyed in real time by poorly managed development projects.

 

On the Deux Branches Response

The Minister celebrates the Prime Minister’s “swift and decisive” action in pausing the Deux Branches project. This mischaracterizes a reactive scramble as responsible governance. Due diligence, environmental impact assessments, and regulatory compliance are meant to occur before projects begin, not midway through construction after environmentalists and ecologists sound the alarm.

 

On the Mariner Development “Monitoring”

The claim that the government continues to monitor the Mariner development and understands the importance of our dive sites strains credibility. If genuine monitoring were occurring, how did obvious and extensive sedimentation continue unchecked for an extended period? The Minister’s assurance that remediation will be “expedited” to address deficiencies is particularly galling—it amounts to an admission that damage has occurred on her government’s watch, despite their supposed monitoring. This is not oversight; this is negligence followed by damage control.

 

On Development Strategy and Regulatory Oversight

The Minister points to the international airport and Cabrits Marina as examples of development paired with environmental management and strong regulatory oversight. But how so when the relevant environmental assessment reports if any, have not been released to the public. What regulatory oversight exists when citizens cannot review any environmental analysis supposedly guiding these massive projects?

 

Pattern of Destruction

What we are witnessing is devastation wrapped in development language. Ecosystems that took millennia to evolve are being obliterated by foreign bulldozers in a matter of months, all in the name of progress. The physical evidence surrounds us: sediment-laden rivers, damaged reefs, cleared forests, disrupted watersheds. These are not abstract environmental concerns; they represent the systematic destruction of Dominica’s most valuable and irreplaceable assets.

 

Our Position

The UPP is calling on the government to account for the reckless mismanagement of our land, our waters, and our natural heritage. Environmental stewardship cannot be reduced to press releases and reactive interventions after public outcry. Dominica’s identity as the Nature Island must be more than a marketing slogan. It must be a commitment reflected in every development decision, every project approval, every regulatory action. Our natural environment is the foundation of our economy, our food security, our water supply, and our future. Once destroyed, it cannot be restored by press releases or belated remediation efforts.

We call on this government to immediately implement transparent environmental review processes, release all relevant assessment reports to the public, ensure adequate compensation for displaced persons, halt projects that cannot demonstrate environmental compliance, and establish genuine regulatory oversight with enforcement capacity. The people of Dominica deserve better than reactive governance and damage control masquerading as environmental stewardship. We demand accountability, transparency, and a fundamental change in how this government approaches development in our Nature Island.

Copyright 2012 Dominica News Online, DURAVISION INC. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.

Disclaimer: The comments posted do not necessarily reflect the views of DominicaNewsOnline.com and its parent company or any individual staff member. All comments are posted subject to approval by DominicaNewsOnline.com. We never censor based on political or ideological points of view, but we do try to maintain a sensible balance between free speech and responsible moderating.

We will delete comments that:

  • contain any material which violates or infringes the rights of any person, are defamatory or harassing or are purely ad hominem attacks
  • a reasonable person would consider abusive or profane
  • contain material which violates or encourages others to violate any applicable law
  • promote prejudice or prejudicial hatred of any kind
  • refer to people arrested or charged with a crime as though they had been found guilty
  • contain links to "chain letters", pornographic or obscene movies or graphic images
  • are off-topic and/or excessively long

See our full comment/user policy/agreement.

5 Comments

  1. dissident
    December 16, 2025

    I concur
    Yes I

  2. hmm
    December 15, 2025

    “If genuine monitoring were occurring, how did Together for progress.” – What? Did they forget to end that sentence or something?

    Also I’m curious as to what plans these people actually have for developing the country. Because it seems like everytime there is some type of development going on they are quick to throw negative criticism. Should we just stay a pristine natural habitat forever with little to no modern infrastructure?

    – The tram is a problem because it somehow disrupts the environment
    – The airport is a problem because it causes damage in its construction
    – The mariner is a problem because its damaging the surrounding marine area
    – The geothermal plant is a problem because allegedly it has the potential to cause earthquakes

    Even the free sporting facility we are going to receive is a problem because it’s slated to be built in the north and not in Roseau like everything else.

    Is there anything they actually support? Genuinely curious

    Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 12
  3. Roger Burnett
    December 15, 2025

    I concur.

    Had it not been for public outcry, work on both projects would have continued unabated.

    On the subject of accountability in general:

    When will the consultant’s report into the cause of the DGS roof collapse, and the comprehensive assessment of all structures under construction at the site, be made available to the public?

    The Prime Minister said: “The incident is being treated with the highest level of seriousness and urgency. As a government, we will leave no stone unturned in determining the cause of this failure and taking all the necessary corrective measures.”

    That was SIX MONTHS ago!

    Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 7
    • Ibo France
      December 15, 2025

      Roosevelt is an expert Liar. To believe even the most innocuous statement that exits his mouth one has to be a person who believes in fairies, mermaids, ghosts, zombies and unicorns.

      Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 7
      • Bwa-Banday
        December 15, 2025

        :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: I hear you loud and clear. Roger that!

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

:) :-D :wink: :( 8-O :lol: :-| :cry: 8) :-? :-P :-x :?: :oops: :twisted: :mrgreen: more »

 characters available