COMMENTARY: An Evaluation of Government Efficiency and Privatization in Dominica

“In vain have you acquired knowledge if you have not imparted it to others” (Deuteronomy Rabbah). This proverb quite aptly describes my motive for publishing. As an Economics(and Computer Science) major at the Dominica State College, I was, for my final Public Sector Economics exam, mandated to write two essays. One of the essays I wrote was an evaluation of government efficiency and privatization in Dominica. My findings are presented below. 

‘Privatization’ is the act of reducing the role of the government in the economy or increasing the role of the private sector in the economy in an activity or in the ownership of assets (Paul Starr, 2012). There are several good reasons why a government might choose to privatize its assets as opposed to holding onto them. Throughout this essay, I will be delineating the intricacies of the postulation -“the government of Dominica should privatize more of its assets”.  

The government of a country is not a business. As a result, it can be opined that whenever assets (i.e projects, businesses, and organizations) are held within a fiscally-constrained environment, they are suffocated. Publicly-owned projects and firms are oftentimes extremely overstaffed. The public sector employs far too many people as part of “job creation drives”. In Dominica for example, well over 70% of the populace is employed by the government and a more inefficient economic situation is hard to imagine. Moreover, with the government in control of such a large sector of the economy, decision-making is greatly impeded as every small decision has to be made by someone who sits higher on the hierarchical ladder. As Charley Reese rightly posited, “Government is inherently incompetent, and no matter what task it is assigned, it will do it in the most expensive and inefficient way possible.” On the other hand, private sector entities have a profit incentive to cut costs and increase efficiency using innovation and improved production methods. Upon performing a financial analysis of the airline – British Airways before and after it was privatized in 1987, it was realized that the company enjoyed higher profits after it was privatized. Not only that, both employees and customers were happier after the privatization and the business could generally be deemed “more efficient”. These new, enjoyed conditions tend to remain consistent among most privatized corporations. Some examples of these include VASP, Petro-Canada, Japan Tobacco and the National Commercial Bank of St. Vincent and the Grenadines. 

 Another compelling argument for privatization is that privatized corporations lack political interference. Governments often make decisions based on political and social pressures rather than sound economic and business reasoning. Unfortunately, the question that’s being asked often is “What can we do that’ll  put us in a good light before the next general elections?” When the question that should be being asked is “What can we do to improve the lives of current and future generations?” 

Lastly, governments can generate much-needed revenue if they privatize more of their assets. For example – in 2014, the Australian government privatized MediBank (a commercial bank) and USD $5.6 billion in much-needed capital was generated. As a small, developing state with a high GDP-to-debt ratio, the government privatizing more of its assets can allow it to get much-needed capital to reinvest in other sectors. During the time period 1901 to 1995, the other members of the Windward Islands had privatized in excess of 48 state-owned businesses and USD $9,6 billion was generated. Dominica is late to jump on the privatization bandwagon, however, as the ratio of government expenditure to real GDP growth is getting higher and higher due to government inefficiency. In 2014, government expenditure was $492.6 M, whereas the real GDP was $484.5 M. In 2015, government expenditure was $513.6 M and the real GDP was $505.8 M (World Bank). This trend holds constant. Government expenditure has been increasing rapidly and the real GDP is not growing as rapidly -i.e the economy is inefficient. When compared to other Caribbean islands (that have been privatizing their assets) such as Barbados and Guadeloupe, it is observed that the ratios of government expenditure to real GDP growth are actually getting lower. 

This trend is extremely dangerous for the economy due to an economic theory called “crowding out”. The theory of ‘crowding out’ argues that rising public sector expenditure drives down (or even exponentially reduces) private sector spending. There are a few paramount sub-theories evolving around the crowding out theory. Firstly, high government expenditure needs to be funded by higher taxes and this impedes the tendency of the private sector to spend and invest. This is one retarding factor to the economy. Secondly, if the government is in control of such a large sector of the economy, the opportunity cost to entrepreneurs to borrow money is significantly greater. These principles can be exemplified by the shutting down of several businesses in Dominica such as Rituals, Paul’s Plastics, Subway, Castaways Hotel, The Cove and DAPEX. 

Economies which are controlled primarily by the government are simply anachronistic in their natures. Modern projects and business ventures are usually mired with complexities for several reasons and they mandate competent, efficient, and productive administrators to oversee them. The public sector, most times is simply unable. 


Editor’s Note: We have been informed that although this article was submitted to DNO by Claudius Sanford, it was not written by him but by DSC student Kodie Jean Jacques.

Disclaimer: The comments on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of Inc. All comments are approved by before they are posted. We never censor based on political or ideological points of view, but we do try to maintain a sensible balance between free speech and responsible moderating.

We will delete comments that:

  • violate or infringe the rights of any person, are defamatory or harassing or include personal attacks
  • are abusive, profane or offensive
  • contain material which violates or encourages others to violate any applicable law
  • promote hatred of any kind
  • refer to people arrested or charged with a crime as though they had been found guilty
  • contain links to "chain letters", pornographic or obscene movies or graphic images
  • are excessively long and off-message

See our full comment/user policy/agreement.


  1. Pablov
    July 12, 2019

    Young lady it seems you needed to put a lot more research into this endeavor. Although Windward Islands generated $9 bil in privatizing it took 94 years as this exercise is more suitable for 1st-world countries. Look what happened when Cdc/Domlec was privatized, Dominicans immediately started paying thru the nose for some of the highest electricity rates the same Windward Islands have ever experienced. Gov’t is right not to get on that privatizing band wagon. Today Dowasco remains a class organization compared to many high profile private companies. Go figure.

    • July 15, 2019

      There are still restrictions on competing electricity generation and private electricity generation. The benefits come from a free market for provision, of which privatisation is only one part.

  2. July 12, 2019

    Miss Jean Jacques is absolutely correct. It’s not even a partisan issue, because both major parties favour programmes like NEP, even though the popularity and expansion of such programmes are a measure of trouble, not success.

    I hope she keeps writing on economic issues, she’s quite insightful!

  3. Jc
    July 12, 2019

    Exactly what the government needs to hear

  4. Karaw
    July 12, 2019

    Bright young student is Mr Jean Jacques.

  5. %
    July 11, 2019

    Brilliant. The readers need more information like this piece . Wonder if lazy Skerrit even reads! He won’t even see that, and will remain the parody of a PM that he is!!
    Good job Mr Sanford!
    Skerrit Must Go
    Skerrit Must Go
    LAZY Skerrit Must Go Now

  6. Bob Denis
    July 11, 2019

    I hope your Latinized first name doesn’t lead you into ending the same way as your roman name sake. It seems that you are well into the new Doctrine of Globalization,which is anti public. Without Gov’t regulations, the Private sector have shown that they can be mordern day slavers , Mr Sanford doesn’t look like he knows much of Dominica’ past history of worker exploitation . We should recommend that Mr Sanford read and gain some more information on this very same Discourse. The policies of the lending Globalist e.g World bank, IMF, and Big Money private banks have historically bring Economic pain via AUSTERITY measures to vast percentages of the world’s population, while enriching a few many times over. Don’t ever forget young Lecturer, that Education is continuous, and it may be time to teach yourself. That being said, both Gov’t and Private sector need each other , presently, the new world order is about to make Gov’t obsolete.

  7. TJ
    July 11, 2019

    Good Show Claudius!

  8. Frank N Stein
    July 11, 2019

    Well expressed! Its a pity Skerrit and his Family Party wont understand a word you just said.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

:) :-D :wink: :( 8-O :lol: :-| :cry: 8) :-? :-P :-x :?: :oops: :twisted: :mrgreen: more »

 characters available